Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8337 Cal
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2022
14.12.2022
Sl.No. 12
Ct.No.3
Amalranjan
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
FMAT 441 of 2022
Ashalata Pal Since Deceased
Rep by Legal Heirs Kripamoy Pal and ors.
VS
Munshi Nurul Islam
With
CAN/1/2022
Mr. Shibasis Ghosh
Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick
Mr. Dwarik Nath Mukherjee
Mr. Manik Lal De
...for the appellants
Mrs. Shohini chakraborty
Ms. Prajaaini Das
...for the respondent
Re: CAN/1/2022
As the point involved is very short, we are
disposing of this appeal dispensing with all
formalities.
Mr. Ghosh, learned advocate appearing for
the appellants is right in his submission that the
documents in question which were not admitted
in evidence by the trial court for the reasons
advanced by it, could not have been introduced
in the learned first appellate court by an
application under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code
of Civil Procedure. Such a document does not
satisfy any of the grounds on which the learned
appellate court could admit a document under
Order 41 Rule 27.
However, the finding of the learned trial
judge with regard to those documents could have
been challenged in the memorandum of appeal
before the learned first appellate court.
In those circumstances, the impugned
judgment and order dated 8th June, 2022 cannot
be sustained. We set it aside.
We give liberty to the respondent to file an
additional memorandum of appeal before the
learned first appellate court by 6th January,
2023.
The learned first appellate court shall
proceed to hear out the appeal afresh and
dispose of it preferably by 31st of March, 2023.
All points are kept open before the learned
first appellate court.
The appeal and the connected application
are disposed of.
( Biswaroop Chowdhury,J. ) ( I. P. Mukerji,J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!