Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Hemarun Sanyal Alias Himarun ... vs Sri Hirak Sanyal & Others
2022 Latest Caselaw 8270 Cal

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8270 Cal
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2022

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Sri Hemarun Sanyal Alias Himarun ... vs Sri Hirak Sanyal & Others on 13 December, 2022
13.12.2022
 rpan/12
                            FAT 303 of 2021
                                     +
                            IA No.: CAN 1 of 2022
                Sri Hemarun Sanyal alias Himarun Sanyal
                                - Versus -
                         Sri Hirak Sanyal & Others

                      Mr. Arindam Banerjee
                                 ... for the Appellant.
                      Mr. Saptansu Basu,
                      Mr. Subhabrata Das,
                      Mr. Ashis Kr. Datta,
                      Mr. Dulal Ch. Pal
                                  ... for the Respondent nos.1, 2, 5 & 6.

This appeal has been filed challenging the final

decree passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division,

10th Court, Alipore in Title Suit no.76 of 2005 ( Partition

suit). In connection with this appeal, an application,

being IA No.: CAN 1 of 2022 has been preferred praying

for an order staying in operation of the judgment and final

decree passed by the learned court below in Title Suit

no.76 of 2005.

In the said application it has been recited that

although there was no dispute regarding the declaration

of share of co-sharers but since at the time of allocation of

their share equal portion of the property could not be

allotted to some of the co-sharers, they were entitled to

owelty money but that owelty money has not been

determined and has not been directed to be paid to the

co-sharers getting lesser portion of the property and

before acceptance of commissioner's report , other points

had also been raised which, according to the appellant,

were not considered by the learned court below .

Such contention has been disputed by Mr. Basu,

learned senior advocate, representing the respondent

nos.1, 2, 5 and 6.

Heard the learned advocates. Perused all the

documents. Here the appellant has raised some

substantial questions of law and facts which need

investigation and decision on merit and hence, we are of

the view that an interim protection as sought for to be

given to the appellant .

Record reveals that this Court on earlier occasion

i.e., on 12th September, 2022 passed an order staying all

further proceedings in Title Execution Case no.40 of 2021

pending before the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division,

10th Court, Alipore.

Considering all the facts and circumstances, we are

inclined to extend the interim order passed by this Court

on 12th September, 2022 till disposal of the appeal.

The stay application, being IA No.: CAN 1 of 2022 is

hereby disposed of.

Let the hearing of the appeal be expedited.

As Mr. Ashis Kr. Datta, learned advocate, has

entered appearance on behalf of the respondent nos.1, 2,

5 and 6, service of notice of appeal upon the said

respondents is dispensed with.

The appellant is directed to put in the requisites

within one week after the Christmas Vacation for service

of notice of appeal upon all the respondents except the

respondent nos.1, 2, 5 and 6.

Lower court records be called for through Special

Messenger at the cost of the appellant. Such cost shall be

deposited by appellant within one week after the

Christmas Vacation.

Immediately, after arrival of lower court records, the

office shall examine the same and, if found complete,

shall issue notice of arrival of lower court records to the

learned advocates appearing for the appellant and the

respondents.

The appellant is directed to prepare requisite

number of informal paper books - printed, typewritten or

cyclostyled, as the case may be, out of Court, within four

weeks from the date of service of notice of arrival of lower

court records and shall file the same after serving copies

thereof upon the learned advocates appearing for the

respondents.

All formalities regarding preparation of paper books

are dispensed with but the learned advocate for the

appellant is directed to incorporate all the relevant

documents in the informal paper books.

Liberty to mention after filing of the paper books.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if

applied for, be supplied to the parties, upon compliance of

all requisite formalities.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter