Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5655 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2022
18.08.2022
KC(9)
S.A.T. 20 of 2017
Binod Behari Manna (deceased)
represented by
Joydeb Manna and Ors.
-versus-
Prafulla Mal (deceased)
Represented by
Harekrishna Mal and Ors.
With
CAN 1 of 2017 (Old CAN No. 883 of 2017)
With
CAN 2 of 2022
With
CAN 3 of 2022
Mr. Krishna Das Poddar,
Mr. Pradip Paul.............................For the appellants.
Mr. Jayanta Kumar Das,
Ms. Madhumanti Das....................For the respondent
nos. 1(a), 1(b) and 3.
This appeal and the connected applications are
mis-conceived. Binod Behari Manna, the appellant
before the first appellate court died during pendency of
the appeal. No step was taken for substitution of his
legal heirs and representatives in his place. The learned
first appellate court pronounced its judgment and
decree, the cause title of the case showing Binod Behari
Manna to be the appellant.
We cannot rectify the records.
This appeal and the connected applications are
disposed of giving liberty to the appellants to approach
the learned court below for rectification of the records. If
such rectification is done, it would be open to the
appellants to prefer the appeal on the self-same
grounds.
(I.P. MUKERJI, J.)
(SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!