Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5620 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2022
18.08.2022
Court No.13
Item No.707
Saswata
WPA 12530 of 2022
Sobha Sabherwal
VS.
The State Of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Chandan Dutta
... for the Petitioner.
Ms. Susmita Biswas Chowdhury
... for the State
Affidavit of service file in Court today is taken on
record.
The petitioner was an Assistant Teacher of a high
school, who retired on 30.09.2007. The first pension
payment order was issued on 27.08.2009 under the ROPA
Rules, 1998. The gratuity amount was disbursed on
30.09.2009 in terms of ROPA, 1998. The petitioner claims
interest on delayed payment of the gratuity amount.
There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating
that there is no statutory period of limitation and neither
parties have suffered due to this delay. It is the
submission of the petitioner that accordingly the petition
should be allowed.
The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. 17557
(W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West
Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied
upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of
India vs. Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on
the issue of limitation relating to payment or refixation of
pay or pension wherein the Apex Court had held that relief
may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the
rights of the third party.
2
In view of the above and after hearing the learned
Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension,
Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West
Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay
interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the gratuity
amount calculated from the next date of retirement till the
date of actual payment. Such payment is to be made
within a period of eight weeks from the date of
communication of this order.
With these observations, the writ petition is
disposed of.
Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called
for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to
have not been admitted by the respondents.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!