Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5553 Cal
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2022
17.08.2022
Sl. No.708
pk
W.P.A. 12443 of 2022
Arjun Kumar Pramanik
-Vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Sabita Khutia (Bhunya)
... for the petitioner
Mr. Dipankar Ghosh
... for the State.
Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept with
the record.
The petitioner was an Assistant Teacher of a
School, who retired on 29.02.2016. The first pension
payment order was issued on 24.02.2016. Under the
ROPA Rules, 2019 there was revision of the pensionary
and gratuity amount payable to the petitioner. The revised
pension payment order was issued on 13.12.2021 and the
revised gratuity and revised arrear pension amount was
disbursed on 15.12.2021 in terms of ROPA, 2019. The
petitioner claims interest on delayed payment of the
revised gratuity and revised arrear pension amount.
There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that
there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties
have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the
petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed.
The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. 17557
(W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West
Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied
upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of
India vs. Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on
the issue of limitation relating to payment or refixation of
2
pay or pension wherein the Apex Court had held that relief
may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the
rights of the third party.
In view of the above and after hearing the learned
Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension,
Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of
West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to
pay interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the
revised gratuity and revised arrear pension amount
calculated on and from 14.02.2020 till the date of actual
payment. Such payment is to be made within a period of
eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.
With these observations, the writ petition is
disposed of.
Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for,
the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to
have not been admitted by the respondents.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!