Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4653 Cal
Judgement Date : 7 September, 2021
13 07.09.2021
Ct.35 AKG CRR 1712 of 2021 (Through Video Conference)
In Re: - An application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
And
In the matter of: Suman Yadav & Anr.
.... Petitioners
Mr. Satadru Lahiri, Mr. Safdar Azam ...For the Petitioners
The present complaint has been filed by the de-facto
complainant/father against his son/petitioner no. 1 and his
wife/petitioner no. 2.
The complaint alleges on December 17, 2010, the petitioners
forcibly snatched and looted his war-medals, trophies and some other
documents. The said complaint was lodged on June 16, 2021.
Mr. Satadru Lahiri, learned advocate, appearing for the
petitioners submits that in view of the bar imposed by Section 468 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, no cognizance can be taken by
the learned Magistrate with regard to the alleged offences.
It appears that the complaint has been filed after about eleven
years from the date of the alleged incident, and the investigation has
been initiated by the investigating agency on the very same date by
registering an F.I.R.
In the present facts and circumstances of the case, a preliminary
enquiry, in view of the judgment reported at (2014) 2 SCC 1 (Lalita
Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh & Others) delivered by
the Supreme Court, was imperative.
In that view of the matter, there shall be a stay of all further
proceeding of G.R. case no. 2712 of 2021 under Sections 379/406/34
of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, pending before the learned Additional
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas, against the
petitioners for a period of eight weeks from date.
List this matter after six weeks under the heading "Contested
Application".
(Kausik Chanda, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!