Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3425 Cal
Judgement Date : 25 June, 2021
24 25.06.2021 (Via Video Conference)
Sc
F.M.A 946 of 2019
with
I.A. No.CAN 2 of 2019
(Old No.CAN 7322 of 2019)
(application for condonation of delay)
with
I.A. No.CAN 1 of 2019
(Old No.CAN 7321 of 2019)
with
I.A. No.CAN 3 of 2019
(Old No.CAN 7323 of 2019)
--------------
Narayan Pramanik & Anr.
Vs.
The United India Insurance Company Limited & Anr.
Mr. Amit Ranjan Roy ...For the Appellants/ Claimants
Ms. Sucharita Paul ....For the Respondent/ Insurance Company
CAN 2 OF 2019 (Old No.CAN 7322 of 2019)
---------------
This is an application for condonation of delay in
filing the instant appeal.
On perusal of the pleadings, this Court is satisfied
that cause shown for delay in filing of the appeal is
sufficient and prayer for condonation of delay should be
allowed.
Accordingly, the application for condonation of
delay being CAN 2 of 2019 stands allowed. The appeal is
restored to its original file and number.
The application for condonation of delay is disposed
of.
CAN 3 of 2019 (Old No.CAN 7323 of 2019)
-----------
This is an application for recording attainment of
majority of the appellant/claimant no.2 who has become
a major.
On perusal of the pleading and the documents
annexed, this Court is satisfied and allows such prayer.
Accordingly, the application for attainment of
majority being CAN 3 of 2019 (CAN 7323 of 2019) is
disposed of. The department is directed to take steps.
FMAT 946 of 2019
The instant appeal has been filed by the
appellants/claimants against the judgment and award
dated February 12, 2019 passed by the Additional
District Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur.
The appellants/claimants submit that the 38 years
old deceased was earning Rs.5000/- per month as a
vegetable seller. However, the tribunal erroneously took
the monthly income to be Rs.3000/-. The appellants/
claimants further submit that the they are entitled to 40%
future prospect on the income of the deceased in view of
the law laid down in Smt. Sarala Verma & Ors. -vs.-
Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., reported in
(2009) 6 SCC 121 and in National Insurance Company
Limited -vs.- Pranay Sethi & Ors., reported in (2017)
16 SCC 680.
Ms. Sucharita Paul counsel appearing on behalf of
the Insurance Company submits that the tribunal was
correct in accepting the income of the deceased to be
Rs.3000/- in absence of appropriate documentary
evidence.
This Court is inclined to accept the submissions
made on behalf of the Insurance Company. However, it is
now accepted in this Court for some time that between
the years 2011 to 2014, the basic income has to be taken
as Rs.4000/- per month. Further, the amount of
Rs.4000/- per month does not appear to be exorbitant at
all for the year 2013, as an unskilled worker working on
all days could have earn Rs.4000/- per month.
Accordingly, on such basis and considering the
submissions advanced by the counsel for the parties, the
monthly income of the deceased should be taken as
Rs.4000/-.
The impugned award is thus modified and the
appellants/claimants are found entitled to a total amount
of Rs.7,42,000/- together with interest thereon at the rate
of 6% per annum from the date of lodging the claim till
the receipt of payment as indicated more fully hereafter.
The monthly income of the victim is taken to be
Rs.4000/- per month. Upon adding 40% as future
prospect, such amount comes to Rs.5,600/- per month.
After annualizing the same and deducting 1/3rd as
personal expenses, it is the figure of Rs.44,800/- on
which a multiplier of 15 would be applied. The net
pecuniary compensation comes to Rs.6,72,000/-. The
appellants/claimants are also entitled to Rs.70,000/- on
account of loss of estate and funeral expenses, taking the
gross compensation to Rs.7,42,000/- together with
interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the
date of lodging the claim till the date of receipt of the
amount.
The appellants/claimants acknowledge receipt of
the entire awarded amount along with interest. The
balance sum of Rs.3,12,000/- would be paid equally to
the appellants/claimants together with interest assessed
at the rate of 6% per annum on and from the date of filing
of the claim application within a period of 45 days from
the date of receipt of the bank account particulars of the
appellants/claimants. Counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellants/claimants will forward the bank account
details of the appellants/claimants within a fortnight
from date to the counsel for the Insurance Company.
The Insurance Company shall upon payment of the
balance amount, be entitled to recover the entire sum
paid to the appellants/claimants from the owner of the
offending vehicle for the reasons already recorded by the
Court below.
With the aforesaid directions the instant appeal is
disposed of. Accordingly, all connected applications are
disposed of. The department is directed to tag the
applications with the appeal.
In view of the above order, execution case in the
court below, if any, remains stayed.
There will be no order as to costs.
Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for,
be furnished upon compliance of all necessary formalities.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!