Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3987 Cal
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2021
Court No. 24 W.P.A. 8578 of 2021
28.07.2021 (via video conference)
(Item No. 8)
Riddhi Das
(AB) VS
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sayan De
Mr. Arpan Guha
Mr. Sayan Kanjilal
........... For the petitioner
Mr. Swapan Kumar Dutta
Mr. Sambuddha Dutta
....... For the respondent Nos. 4 & 5
Ms. Nandini Mitra ....... For the University Mr. Rama Prasad Sarkar ..... for the State
The petitioner prays for compassionate
appointment. The day when the employee died the
college was affiliated to the West Bengal State
University. The said University does not have a
scheme for providing appointment on compassionate
ground in the died-in-harness category.
The appointment on compassionate ground
ought not to be granted in the absence of a scheme.
As there is no scheme of the University, accordingly
no direction can be passed upon the University for
consideration of her prayer.
The petitioner tries to convince the Court
relying upon an unreported order dated 10th
February, 2021 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench
of this Court in MAT 375 of 2020 with IA No. CAN 1 of
2020 (Smt. Sumona Roy nee Saha Vs. the State of
West Bengal & Ors.) wherein the Court was pleased to
dispose of the appeal by permitting the college
authority to seek a recommendation from the College
Service Commission with regard to the consideration
of the candidature of the writ petitioner for any group
- 'D' post of the college where petitioner's father was
working upon age relaxation when the recruitment of
group 'D' post will be initiated by the said college
along with other candidates. The aforesaid direction
has been passed in view of the peculiar circumstances
of the said case.
The learned advocate representing the State
respondents relies upon an unreported judgment
dated 4th February, 2019 passed by the Hon'ble
Division Bench of this Court in WPST 35 of 2018
(Arindam Chowdhury & Anr. Vs. the State of West
Bengal & Ors.) wherein the Court held that in the
absence of any provision in the statutory notifications
creating any source of legal right in favour of the
petitioner to claim compassionate appointment, the
relief sought for cannot be granted.
It is settled law that appointment on
compassionate ground cannot be claimed as a matter
of right which necessarily flows from the scheme. In
the absence of any scheme permitting appointment in
the died-in-harness category this Court is not in a
position to grant any relief to the petitioner. Moreover
there is no peculiarity in the facts and circumstances
of the instant case requiring following the dictum of
this Court in the matter of Smt. Sumona Roy nee
Saha (supra).
Accordingly, the writ petition stands
dismissed.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be supplied to the parties upon
completion of usual legal formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!