Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3975 Cal
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2021
27th July, 2021 (AD 24) (SKB)
C.O. 1287 of 2021 (Via Video Conference)
Uday Kumar Banerjee and another Versus Ajoy Majumder and others
Mr. Probal Kumar Mukherjee, Mr. Debabrata Acharyya ... for the petitioners.
Upon query of the Court, learned Counsel for the
petitioners submits that no application under Order 21
Rules 97-101 of the Code of Civil Procedure is pending at
the behest of the judgment-debtor/opposite parties before
the Executing Court. As such, in view of the innocuous
nature of the order proposed to be passed, no prior
service of notice on the opposite parties is deemed
necessary.
C.O.1287 of 2021 is disposed of by requesting the
Civil Judge (Junior Division), Fifth Court at Alipore,
District- South 24-Parganas to dispose of Ejectment
Execution Case No. 29 of 2019 (F-2479/19), arising out of
Ejectment Suit No. 23 of 2006, pending before the said
court, as expeditiously as possible, positively within two
months from the date of communication of this order to
the Executing Court.
The petitioners shall communicate this order to the
executing court as well as on the opposite parties and/or
their advocate in the court below at the earliest, along
with a server copy of this order.
The parties as well as the court below and/or their
advocates appearing in the Executing Court shall act on
the communication of the learned advocate for the
petitioners, accompanied by a server copy of this order,
without insisting on prior production of the certified copy.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be made available to the parties upon
compliance with the requisite formalities.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!