Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Asha Gorai & Ors vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr
2021 Latest Caselaw 3937 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3937 Cal
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Smt. Asha Gorai & Ors vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr on 26 July, 2021
S/L 13
26.7.2021
Court No.26
AD
                                    FMA 433 of 2019
                              (Via Video Conference)

                                Smt. Asha Gorai & Ors.
                                          Vs.
                           National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.


              Mr. Jayanta Mondal
                                       ... for the Appellants/Claimants.
              Ms. Sucharita Paul
                           ... for the Respondent/Insurance Company.

The above appeal has been filed by the claimants against

the judgement and award dated 10th April, 2018, passed by the

Learned Judge, Special Court Cum-Additional District Judge &

Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Durgapur, Burdwan, in

M.A.C. Case No.33 of 2013 (198/11) on a claim under section

166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants rely on the dictum in Nagappa -Vs.-Guru

Dayal Singh & Ors, reported in [2003] 2 SCC 274 and submit

that the learned Court below erred in not awarding 'just

compensation' to the claimants/appellants. Since the claimants

had claimed a sum of Rs.29,00,000/- in their claim application,

the learned Tribunal had erroneously restricted the award to Rs.

29,00,000/- only, in spite of assessing an amount of Rs.

42,14,535/- as the total compensation. It is further submitted that

considering 4 nos. of dependents, the deduction on account of

personal expenses should have been 1/4th instead of 1/3rd in view

of the law as it stands now after the judgments delivered by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Smt. Sarla Verma & Ors.

Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., reported in (2009) 6

SCC 121.

Mrs. Paul, the Ld. Advocate appearing on behalf of the

Insurance Company submits that the correct multiplier in the

instant case should be 15 instead of 16, as adopted by the learned

Court below, in view of the Sarla Verma (supra) and amount

granted under the collective heads of general damages should

have been restricted to Rs.70,000/- only, in view of the

judgement passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors.,

reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680.

This Court finds substance in the arguments made by both

the parties. Accordingly, the impugned award is modified and

reassessed as follows:

Particulars                                       Amount (Rs.)

Annual income                                      2,69,500.00
Less: 1/4th personal expenses                     (-) 67,375.00
                                                   2,02,125.00
Add 40% future prospect                           (+)80,850.00
                                                   2,82,975.00
Multiplier of 15 to be used                              (x) 15
                                                  42,44,625.00
Collective heads of General Damages              (+) 70,000.00
                                                  43,14,625.00
Less: Awarded amount                          (-) 29,00,000.00
Differential amount                              14,14,625.00





The claimants acknowledge receipt of the entire awarded

amount of Rs.29,00,000/- along with interest. The balance

amount of Rs. 14,14,625/- would become payable to the

claimants by the Insurance Company together with interest

assessed @ 6 per cent per annum, from the date of filing of the

claim petition within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt

of the bank account particulars of the claimants. Advocate for

the claimants will forward the bank account details of the

claimants within a fortnight from date to the Advocate for the

insurance company. The payment shall be made in the

proportion decided by the Court below

With the aforesaid directions, the instant appeal is

disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

In view of the disposal of this appeal, connected

application, if any, is also disposed of.

The concerned Department is directed to tag the

applications, if any, with the main appeal.

The Registry is directed to send down the lower court

records at once, if received by this time.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied

for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all formalities,

on priority basis.

(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter