Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Amal Kumar Dey vs The United India Insurance Co. ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 3633 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3633 Cal
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Sri Amal Kumar Dey vs The United India Insurance Co. ... on 7 July, 2021
07.07.2021
  ss
                                 F.M.A.T. 1198 of 2018
                          I.A. CAN 1 of 2018 (old No. CAN 9302 of 2018)
                                    ( Via Video Conference )

                                  Master Sandip Kumar Dey
                     represented by his natural guardian grandfather
                                  Sri Amal Kumar Dey
                                          Vs.
                       The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & ors.

                   Mr. Krishanu Banik       ...For the Appellant/claimant

                   Mr. Rajesh Singh         ... For the respondent No.2/

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Ms. Sucharita Paul ... For the respondent no.1/ The United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

I.A. CAN 1 of 2018 (old No.CAN 9302 of 2018)

Since the original application is not found in the

file, the photostat copy of the application for condonation

of delay is taken on record and the same be treated as

original.

On perusal of the pleadings, this Court is satisfied

that cause shown for delay in filing of the appeal is

sufficient and prayer for condonation of delay should be

allowed.

Accordingly, the application for condonation of

delay stands allowed.

By consent of the parties, instant appeal is treated

as on day's list and is taken up for hearing.

The department is directed to issue F.M.A. number

immediately.

FMAT 1198 of 2018 The appeal is directed against the judgment and

award dated June 25, 2018 passed by the Learned Judge,

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District and

Session Judge, 2nd Court, Raiganj, Uttar Dinajpur in

M.A.C. Case No. 117 of 2017, on a claim under Section

166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.

The claimant submits that the learned tribunal

erred in not awarding any future prospect on the notional

income of the victim. In view of the law as it stands now,

after the judgments delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of National Insurance Company Ltd.

Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors., reported in (2017) 16 SCC

680, the claimant is entitled to 40% as future prospects.

Both the Insurance Companies are represented.

This Court is inclined to accept the submissions

made on behalf of the appellant. The impugned award is

thus modified. The claimant in the claim application had

stated that the notional income of the deceased was

Rs.3,000/- per month. Accordingly, on such basis, upon

adding 40% as future prospect and deducting 1/3rd as

personal expenses, it is the figure of Rs.33,600/- on

which a multiplier of 16 would be applied. The net

pecuniary compensation comes to Rs.5,37,600/-. The

claimant is also entitled to Rs.30,000/- on account of loss

of estate and funeral expenses, taking the gross

compensation to Rs.5,67,600/- together with interest

thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of

lodging the claim till the date of receipt of the amount.

The claimant acknowledges receipt of the entire

awarded amount of Rs.4,14,000/- along with interest.

The balance sum of Rs.1,53,600/- would become payable

to the appellant, together with interest assessed at the

rate of 6 per cent per annum on and from the date of

filing of the claim petition within a period of 45 days from

the date of receipt of the bank account particulars of the

appellant. Learned Advocate for the Appellant will forward

the bank account details of the appellant within a

fortnight from date to the learned Advocate for the

Insurance Company. The payment shall be made in equal

share, by both the Insurance Companies (The New India

Assurance Company Limited & United India Insurance

Company Limited) to the claimant.

With the aforesaid directions the instant appeal is

disposed of.

In view of the disposal of this appeal, connected

applications, if any, are also disposed of. The concerned

Department is directed to tag the applications, if any,

with the main appeal

There will be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if

applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all

formalities, on priority basis.

(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter