Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sandip Somnath Hiray vs State Of Maharashtra
2026 Latest Caselaw 1193 Bom

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1193 Bom
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Sandip Somnath Hiray vs State Of Maharashtra on 3 February, 2026

Author: Madhav J. Jamdar
Bench: Madhav J. Jamdar
  2026:BHC-AS:5426                                                            909-ABA-303-2026.DOC




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.303 OF 2026


                      Sandip Somnath Hiray                                        ...Applicant
                            Versus
       Digitally
       signed by      The State of Maharashtra                                    ...Respondent
       SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
       2026.02.03     Mr. Rajaram Gite a/w. Ms. Siddhi Dawne, for the Applicant.
       14:53:58
       +0530          Ms. R. V. Newton, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                    CORAM:      MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                                                    DATED :     3rd FEBRUARY 2026
                      PC:-


                      1.       Heard Mr. Gite, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant

                      and Ms. Newton, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State.



                      2.       This application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of

                      Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking pre-arrest bail in connection

                      with C.R. No.27 of 2025 registered with Malegaon Chawani Police

                      Station, Nashik Rural, Nashik, for the offences punishable under

                      Sections 506, 504, 420, 323 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code,

                      1860.




                                                              Page 1
                      Sonali

                     ::: Uploaded on - 03/02/2026                       ::: Downloaded on - 03/02/2026 20:52:36 :::
                                                    909-ABA-303-2026.DOC




 3.       As per the prosecution case, the subject property has been

 sold by a registered sale-deed dated 19th July 2022 for a total

 consideration of Rs.2,41,00,000/-. However, only an amount of

 Rs.27,00,000/- has been paid by RTGS and it was represented that

 the balance amount would be paid after registration of the

 saledeed and thereafter all Accused ran away.



 4.       It is the submission of Mr. Gite, learned Counsel for the

 Applicant that the First Informant has purchased the suit property

 by a registered sale-deed dated 4 th October 2021 for an amount of

 Rs.23,05,000/- and thereafter the same has been sold to the

 Accused No.1 for an amount of Rs.27,00,000/-. He submits that

 the said entire payment has been made. He submits that, in any

 case, the incident has taken place on 19 th July 2022 and the FIR

 has been lodged on 18th January 2025. He submits that the

 Charge-sheet is filed against some Accused and, therefore,

 investigation is substantially completed. He submits that although

 there is one antecedent, the same is of they year 2022 and the

 Applicant has been granted pre-arrest bail in the said crime.




                                 Page 2
 Sonali

::: Uploaded on - 03/02/2026                 ::: Downloaded on - 03/02/2026 20:52:36 :::
                                                        909-ABA-303-2026.DOC




 5.        Ms. Newton, learned APP strongly opposes the Anticipatory

 Bail Application. She submits that submits that the offence is very

 serious and, therefore, custodial interrogation is necessary. She

 submits that investigation is transferred to the EOW. She submits

 that the Charge-sheet is almost ready and the same can be filed

 shortly. She submits that as far as the Accused No.4, there is one

 antecedent and the same modus operandi is involved in the said

 crimes.



 6.        Perusal of the record shows that the Applicant-Accused No.1

 purchased the subject property on 19th July 2022 by a registered a

 sale-deed. The said registered sale-deed mentions consideration is

 at       Rs.27,00,000/-.      Undisputedly,   the    said      amount         of

 Rs.27,00,000/- has been paid to the First Informant. The FIR has

 been lodged on 18th January 2025 i.e. after a delay of about 2

 years and 6 months. The Applicant's role is that he was present

 when the alleged incident took place. The accused No.1 who is the

 main accused has already been granted pre-arrest bail by this

 Court by order dated 23rd January 2026 passed in Anticipatory Bail

 Application No.443 of 2025.




                                     Page 3
 Sonali

::: Uploaded on - 03/02/2026                     ::: Downloaded on - 03/02/2026 20:52:36 :::
                                                        909-ABA-303-2026.DOC




 7.       Accordingly, the case is made out for grant of Anticipatory

 Bail. For the above reasons, the Anticipatory Bail Application is

 allowed by passing the following order is passed:


                                  ORDER

(a) In the event of arrest of the Applicant-Sandip

Somnath Hiray in connection with C.R. No.27 of 2025

registered with the Malegaon Chawani Police Station,

Nashik Rural, Nashik, the Applicant is directed to be

released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum

of Rs.50,000/- with one or two solvent sureties in the

like amount.

(b) The Applicant shall attend the Malegaon Chawani

Police Station, Nashik Rural, Nashik, once in 15 days

i.e. on first and third Sunday of every month between

11:00 a.m. to 02:00 p.m., till framing of the charge

and shall co-operate with the investigation.

(c) The Applicant shall furnish his cell phone number and

residential address to the Investigating Officer and

shall keep the same updated, in case of any change

thereto.

Page 4 Sonali

909-ABA-303-2026.DOC

(d) The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any

inducement, threat, or promise to any person

acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or

to any Police personnel.

(e) The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution

evidence and shall not contact or influence the

Complainant or any witness in any manner.

(f) The Applicant shall not leave India without prior

permission of the learned Trial Court/concerned

Sessions Court.

8. The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

Page 5 Sonali

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter