Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Amol Maroti Konkatwar vs State Of Maharashtra Through Its ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 4267 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4267 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2025

Bombay High Court

Amol Maroti Konkatwar vs State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... on 27 June, 2025

Author: Ravindra V. Ghuge
Bench: Ravindra V. Ghuge
2025:BHC-AUG:16948-DB



                                                              906 WP NO.1455.2025 JUDG
                                                 -1-

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                WRIT PETITION NO. 1455 OF 2025

                    Amol S/o Maruti Konkatwar,
                    Age : 30 years, Occu : Service,
                    R/o : Bhaktapur, Tq. Degloor,
                    Dist. Nanded
                                                                  ....     Petitioner

                                             Versus

              1     The State of Maharashtra
                    Through its Secretary,
                    Tribal Development Department,
                    Mantralaya, Mumbai

              2     Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification
                    Committee, Kinwat Head Quarter,
                    Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar,
                    Through its Member Secretary

              3     The Collector,
                    Jalna District, Jalna.

              4.    The Tahsildar
                    Ambad, Tq. Ambad, Dist. Jalna
                                                                 ....     Respondents
                                                   ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. P. B. Gapat
              AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. V. M. Kagne
                                                   ...

                                CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
                                        Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
                                    Dated : June 27, 2025
                                                906 WP NO.1455.2025 JUDG
                                   -2-


ORAL JUDGMENT :-

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with

the consent of the parties.

2. The Petitioner is in service with Respondent No. 4. He

secured employment on a post which was reserved for the

'Mannervarlu" Scheduled Tribe. He claims to be belonging to the said

community. Having obtained a job on the claim of belonging to the

reserved category, he moved for validation and by the impugned order

dated 22.01.2025, the claim has been invalidated.

3. This Court has delivered an order on 24.02.2025 in Writ

Petition Nos. 12300 of 2024, 12313 of 2024 and 12315 of 2024. These

Petitioners namely Girish Gangadhar Konkatwar, Gayatri Gangadhar

Konkatwar and Amit Maroti Konkatwar, have been conditionally

granted Validity Certificates in view of Shweta Balaji Isankar vs. State

of Maharashtra [(2018) SCC OnLine Bom 10363].

4. Amit Maroti is the biological younger brother of the present

Petitioner Amol Maroti. Girish Gangadhar and Gayatri Gangadhar are

siblings, who are the children of Gangadhar. The present Petitioner's and

Amit's father, is Maruti who is the biological brother of Gangadhar.

Ramlu had two sons namely Maruti and Pandhari and four daughters

namely Laxmi, Anjanbai, Gangamani and Sushila. Now Girish and

Gayatri and Amit have also been granted the Validity Certificate. There

are several other Validity Holders from the clan originating from Ballyya

/ Balanna Konkatwar. For clarity, Balayya had two sons namely

Yellappa and Iranna. All the above mentioned candidates are from the

branch of Yellappa. Even from the branch of Iranna, there are several

Validity Holders. This entire family relationship is visible from page 63

in the Petition Paper-book.

5. The learned AGP had sought an overnight passover

yesterday to take instructions as regards the relationship. On instructions,

he submits that the relationship of these persons with Amol Maroti

Konkatwar, are undisputed.

6. Since this Court has applied the law laid down in Shweta

Balaji Isankar (supra), in the case of Girish, Gayatri and Amit (supra),

this Petition is partly allowed. The impugned order dated 22.01.2025

stands quashed and set aside. The Petitioner would be granted a

conditional Validity Certificate within 30 days from today. The

Respondent - Employer would refrain from initiating any action against

the present Petitioner. Needless to state, the law laid down in Shweta

Balaji Isankar (supra), would be squarely applicable to the present

Petitioner if any of the Validity Holders referred to here-in-above,

suffers invalidation after reopening of the case.

7. Rule is made party absolute in the above terms.

(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.)                     (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)



Omkar Joshi
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter