Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ganesh Hanuwantrao Kaple vs The State Of Maha. Thr. The Director Of ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 3931 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3931 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 June, 2025

Bombay High Court

Ganesh Hanuwantrao Kaple vs The State Of Maha. Thr. The Director Of ... on 12 June, 2025

Author: M.S. Jawalkar
Bench: M.S. Jawalkar
2025:BHC-NAG:5479-DB


                                                              1                                wp2012.24.odt



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

                                       WRIT PETITION NO.2012 OF 2024

                     Ganesh Hanuwantrao Kaple
                     Age 56 yrs, Occ: Agriculturist,
                     R/o Bilanpura, Achalpur, Tq. Achalpur,
                     Dist. Amravati.                                                   .....PETITIONER

                                 ...V E R S U S...

                1. The State of Maharashtra through
                   The Director of Town Planning,
                   State of Maharashtra, Central Building,
                   Pune-1.

                2. The Municipal Council,
                   Achalpur, through its Chief Officer,
                   Achalpur, Tq. Achalpur,
                   Dist. Amravati.                                                    ...RESPONDENTS

                -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Shri R.G. Mundhada, Advocate for petitioner.
                Ms Deepali Sapkal, AGP for respondent no.1.
                Shri Y.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for respondent no.2.
                -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         CORAM:- SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR & M.W. CHANDWANI, JJ.
                         DATED :- 12.06.2025

                ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per : M.W. Chandwani, J.)

. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by

consent of the parties.

2. The petition seeks to impose deeming fiction provided under

Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966

(for short "MRTP Act").

2 wp2012.24.odt

3. The petitioner is the owner of the land Survey No.20/2

admeasuring 1.04 HR pot-kharab area 0.07 HR total admeasuring

1.11 HR of Mouza Kehtapmali, Tehsil Achalpur, District Amravati.

The revised development plan for the city of Achalpur was notified

in Government Gazette on 01.03.2003 showing that the land of the

petitioner is reserved for the purpose of construction of a garden

vide Reservation No.62 and for a 12 meter wide DP road. No steps

were taken to acquire the land and to develop the land for the

purpose for which it was reserved in the Development Plan dated

01.03.2003.

4. Therefore, the petitioner issued a statutory notice dated

09.11.2020 asking the respondent no.2-Planning Authority to

acquire the said land for the purpose of development. In spite of

service of notice, no steps were taken by respondent no.2 - Planning

Authority. Since, no steps were taken, the present writ petition came

to be filed.

5. Respondent no.2 filed its reply thereby raising an

objection that the document of title as well as the original

measurement-sheet have not been supplied by the petitioner.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn our

attention towards the reply to the RTI application given by 3 wp2012.24.odt

respondent no.2, wherein it has been mentioned that the petitioner

has supplied the copy of notice alongwith 7/12 extract as well as

copy of measurement, which itself falsifies the stand taken by

respondent no.2 in its reply. That apart, it is not necessary for the

petitioner to supply the copy of original measurement sheet since the

requirement under Section 127 of the MRTP Act is to supply the

documents showing interest. Therefore, the objection raised by

respondent no.2 in its reply does not survive.

7. The ownership of the petitioner and issuance of notice

dated 09.11.2020 has not been disputed. It is a matter of record that

no steps have been taken by respondent no.2 till date to acquire the

land for the purpose of development of the garden as shown in the

DP plan. Therefore, the necessary consequences will follow and by

deeming fiction, the land of the petitioner is free from Reservation

No.62. Therefore, we find substance in the argument of the learned

counsel for the petitioner.

8. In view of above, we are inclined to allow the writ

petition and pass the following order:

(i)          The Writ Petition is allowed.
                                    4                      wp2012.24.odt



(ii)          It is declared that the reservation No.62 on the land of

the petitioner total admeasuring 1.11 HR of Survey No.20/2 of

Mouza Kehtapmali, Tehsil Achalpur, District Amravati stands lapsed

and the petitioner is free to develop the said land owned by him in

the manner permissible to the adjacent land as per the Development

Plan of city of Achalpur.

(iii) The respondents are directed to notify and publish the

same in the official gazette within three months from today.

(iv) Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No costs.

(M.W. CHANDWANI, J.) (SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.)

Wagh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter