Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Megha Dadaji Deore vs The Deputy Director (Education), ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 3920 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3920 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 June, 2025

Bombay High Court

Megha Dadaji Deore vs The Deputy Director (Education), ... on 12 June, 2025

Author: Ravindra V. Ghuge
Bench: Ravindra V. Ghuge
2025:BHC-AS:24210-DB
                                                                 .. 1 ..                 913 WP-13651-2016.odt



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           Digitally signed
           by
           HUSENBASHA
                                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN
RAHAMAN    NADAF
NADAF
           Date:
           2025.06.19
                                               WRIT PETITION NO. 13651 OF 2016
           14:23:31 +0530



                                       Megha Dadaji Deore                      ]
                                       Age: Adult, Occ: Services               ]
                                       Residing at Post Sawkarwadi,            ]
                                       Tal. Malegaon, District Nasik           ]       ...Petitioner

                                                Versus

                               1.      The Deputy Director (Education)    ]
                                       Nashik Divison, Nashik Road Nashik ]

                               2.      The Education Officer (Secondary)       ]
                                       Zilla Parishad, Nashik Near             ]
                                       Chatrapati Shivaji Stadium Nashik       ]

                               3.      The Chairman                            ]
                                       Sarvangin Vikas Mandal Tehere,          ]
                                       Taluka Malegaon District Nashik         ]

                               4.      The Secretary                           ]
                                       Sarvangin Vikas Mandal Tehere,          ]
                                       Taluka Malegaon District Nashik         ]

                               5.      The Principal                           ]
                                       Samata Vidyalay and Higher              ]
                                       Secondary School, Tehere,               ]
                                       Taluka Malegaon District Nashik         ]    ...Respondents

                               Ms. Varsha Palav a/w. Mr Rekha Musale & Mr. Ajinkya Palav,
                               Advocates i/b. The Laureate, for the Petitioner.
                               Ms. Priyank Chavan, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2/State.
                               Ms. Pooja Malik i/by Mr. N.R. Bubna, Advocate for Respondent
                               Nos.4 & 5.
                                                             ****

                                                             CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
                                                                    M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

                                                             DATE    : 12th JUNE, 2025
                               Husen




                              ::: Uploaded on - 19/06/2025                     ::: Downloaded on - 21/06/2025 20:30:53 :::
                                         .. 2 ..             913 WP-13651-2016.odt




 JUDGMENT (Per Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.)

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard

finally, by the consent of the Parties.

2. The Petitioner has put forth the following prayers :-

                   "a)         Rule be issued;

                   b)     By an appropriate Writ, Order or
                   Direction of this Hon'ble Court, the

Respondents be directed to regularize the Petitioner's service as Assistant Teacher for full-time from the date of her appointment i.e. 15th July, 1997 till date and the same be continued to teach the subject "Marathi" with Samata Secondary and Higher Secondary School being run Sarvangin Vikas Mandal, Tehere, Tal. Malegaon, Dist. Nasik; and all the consequential benefits thereto be made available to her;

c) Pending the hearing and disposal of the present petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to continue the Petitioner's service as an Assistant Teacher to teach the subject "Marathi" with Samata Secondary and Higher Secondary School being run Sarvangin Vikas Mandal, Tehere, Tal.

Malegaon, Dist. Nasik;"

3. The Petitioner contends that she acquired her

Masters Degree (post graduate) in Arts with 1st Class in the

Marathi subject, in 1995. She completed her B.Ed course in the Husen

.. 3 .. 913 WP-13651-2016.odt

1996. On 15.07.1997, she was appointed on clock hour basis by

the Respondent Management. Such engagement was continued

from 12.06.1998, with further orders passed each year. On the

basis of the record, it is clear that she was appointed on clock

hour basis by the Chairman and Management on year-to-year

basis.

4. On 11.12.2010, the Petitioner addressed a letter to

the Principal of the School indicating that a full-time sanctioned

post for the subject English and Marathi were advertised in

Dainik Lokmat Newspaper. The Petitioner was taken back by the

said advertisement and she, therefore, requested the Management

to consider her case on sympathetic ground for engaging her on a

full-time basis. The voluminous records placed before us indicate

that even the approval granted by the Competent Authority to the

Petitioner's engagement, was purely on clock hour basis, on

yearly basis.

5. The Management has relied upon a legal reply dated

21.07.2016 to the legal notice dated 28.06.2016, which was

issued on behalf of the Petitioner. The contents of the legal notice

were denied by the Management in a lengthy reply and it was

also brought to the notice of the Petitioner's Advocate that the Husen

.. 4 .. 913 WP-13651-2016.odt

Petitioner was not reporting for duty on clock hour basis, from

16.06.2016. As per the staffing pattern, there was no work load

of a full-time teacher or requirement of a full-time teacher.

6. The learned AGP has referred to the affidavit-in-

reply dated 10.08.2018 filed by the Assistant Director of

Education, Nashik Region. It is specifically averred that the

Petitioner has been consistently engaged by the Management on

clock hour basis. The Petitioner was never engaged on a

sanctioned aided post of an Assistant Teacher for Marathi

subject. It is contended that neither the Petitioner is working

from 2016, nor is a vacant permanent post available.

7. The approvals that were recorded by the Education

Department were purely on clock hour basis from time to time.

The work load handled by the Petitioner was for 11 periods in the

academic year 1998-99. The workload was of 12 periods on

clock hour basis in the year 2003-04. For academic year 2004-

2005, the approval was for 10 periods on clock hour basis on the

condition that the expenditure of the salary would be borne by

the Management. Until the academic year 2015, she was working

on clock hour basis. In paragraph 21 of the affidavit, it is stated

that she never participated in any recruitment process for a Husen

.. 5 .. 913 WP-13651-2016.odt

sanctioned full-time teacher's post.

8. In the light of the above, we do not find that the

Petitioner could make out a case for issuance of a direction to

treat her service on a full-time sanctioned post. It is beyond

debate that an employee can be granted approval for a sanctioned

full-time grant-in-aid post only if the post is created under

staffing pattern and is available. Moreover, the claimant has to

participate in the selection process to be conducted for

recruitment to such a post. The Management brings to our notice

that the Petitioner has not been working from 2016 onwards.

There is no record before us indicating that the Education

Department has granted approvals to the Petitioner's engagement

on clock hour basis even for the academic year 2017-2018 or

thereafter.

9. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is

dismissed. Rule is discharged.

(M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

Husen

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter