Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pawan Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Va ... vs State Of Maha., Thr. Its Secretary, ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 1645 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1645 Bom
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2025

Bombay High Court

Pawan Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Va ... vs State Of Maha., Thr. Its Secretary, ... on 17 January, 2025

Author: Avinash G. Gharote
Bench: Avinash G. Gharote
2025:BHC-NAG:523-DB

                                                                             WP 310 of 2024 - Judgment.odt
                                                                1

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

                                            WRIT PETITION NO.310/2024


                      PETITIONER :                  Pawan Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Va Samajik
                                                    Vikas Sanstha, Through its Secretary, Plot
                                                    No.34, Vaibhav Laxmi Nagar, Shanti Nagar
                                                    Square, Vayfad Road, Umri Meghe, Wardha
                                                          ...VERSUS...
                      RESPONDENTS :                 1. State of Maharashtra, through its
                                                       Secretary, Medical Education & Drugs
                                                       Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.
                                                    2. Maharashtra State Board of Nursing And
                                                       Paramedical Education, Through its
                                                       Director, Government Dental College And
                                                       Hospital Building, St. Georges Hospital
                                                       Campus, Fort, Mumbai - 01.
                                                                                                                   5
                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for petitioner
                                   Ms Tanjwar Khan, AGP for respondent No.1
                                   Mr T.S. Kene, Advocate for respondent No.2
                  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------     10

                                                     CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND
                                                             ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

DATE : 17/01/2025

1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard

finally with the consent of the learned Counsels for the respective

parties.

WP 310 of 2024 - Judgment.odt

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the communication dated

07/04/2022 (pg.31) and the further communication dated

28/05/2024 (pg.47-D) refusing to permit the students of the

petitioner/Institution enrolled in the A.N.M. and G.N.M. courses from

3. The basic grievance is that though the petitioner was

granted permission to continue the A.N.M. program with an intake

capacity of 20 seats for the academic year 2021-2022 by the

communication dated 30/08/2022, the last date for such enrollment

being 07/04/2022 and permission to start G.N.M. program for the 10

academic year 2021-22 with intake capacity of 50 seats by the

communication dated 07/04/2022 (pg.31) the last date for

enrollment was 07/04/2022, since the date for enrollment had

already been expired before the grant of permission by virtue of the

judgment in Pawan Bahu-Uddeshiya Shikshan Va Samajik Vikas 15

Sanstha through its Secretary Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its

Secretary, Medical Education & Drugs Department, Manatralaya,

Mumbai -32 and another, (Writ Petition No.6702/2022, decided on WP 310 of 2024 - Judgment.odt

16/01/2023) (pg.32) the petitioner was granted the following

reliefs:

"(i) The order dated 09.01.2023 is modified in view of the fair statement made by the learned counsel for respondent 2 that the students of the petitioner - society shall be considered as 5 irregular batch and an examination shall be held for them in the month of March, 2023.

(ii) We may record that the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Anand Parchure has no objection if the examination is held in March, 2023, positively and the students of the 10 petitioner - society are permitted to appear as irregular batch."

4. In pursuance to this, the petitioner has enrolled students

in the A.N.M. and G.N.M. Courses, who have been permitted to

appear in the examination time to time under the orders of this

Court. The situation as of now is that the supplementary 15

examinations are to commence from 21/01/2025.

5. Mr. Parchure, learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that since the permission to continue/commence course was granted

subsequent to the last date for enrollment, the right of the petitioner

and students enrolled is protected by the judgment of this Court 20

dated 16/01/2023 in Writ Petition No.6702/2022, in view of which, WP 310 of 2024 - Judgment.odt

the respondents, cannot now insist for grant of permission from the

Court again before the commencement of each examination.

6. We find that since the permission to continue/

commence the A.N.M./G.N.M. course was granted after/on the last

date of admission, the rights of the petitioner and the students 5

admitted, would be protected by the judgment of this Court dated

16/01/2023 in Writ Petition No.6702/2022. The writ petition is,

therefore, allowed by quashing the impugned communication and

directing the respondents to treat the students enrolled in pursuance

to the above permissions dated 30/08/2022 (pg.26) and 10

07/04/2022 (pg. 31) for A.N.M. and G.N.M. courses, to be regular

admissions though an illegal batch, entitled to all the incidences as

such. This is however subject to the condition that in case in the

future it is found that the petitioner has not enrolled students within

time, the Court would not be inclined to show any indulgence to the 15

petitioner.

7. This is also with a direction to the State that any

application which is received by it, ought to be decided in a WP 310 of 2024 - Judgment.odt

reasonable time, much less to say well before the last date of

enrollment of the students. In case we find that in the future this is

not being done, we shall be constrained to impose exemplary costs

upon the State not less than Rs.50,000/-.

8. We further direct the respondents to verify the 5

documents, which may be sent by the petitioner in respect of the

ensuing examination. Such documents shall be sent by tomorrow

and the verification shall be done by tomorrow itself and the

admission card for the examination commencing from 21/01/2025,

for the purpose of ensuring the appearance of the students enrolled 10

in terms of the judgment of this Court dated 16/01/2023 in Writ

Petition No.6702/2022 shall also be issued. The writ petition is

accordingly allowed in the above terms. Rule is made absolute in the

aforesaid terms. No order as to costs.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

KOLHE

Signed by: Mr. Ravikant Kolhe Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 17/01/2025 18:40:10

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter