Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3838 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2025
2025:BHC-AUG:22961
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11620 OF 2024
IN SAST/25365/2024
Savitribai Pratapsing Padvi And Ors
VERSUS
Daulatsing Mansing Padvi
Mr. S. P. Pandit, Advocate for Applicants
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2025
PER COURT :-
1. None appears for respondent in spite of service of notice.
2. Absence of respondent and their counsel indicates that they
respondent has no inclination to oppose the application.
3. This application is for condonation of delay of 314 days in
preferring the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2023 passed
in Regular Civil Appeal No. 16/2018.
4. It is contention of the applicant/appellant that for want of
information about the order passed by the First Appellate Court from the
advocate, the appeal could not be filed in time. This contention of the
applicant/appellant has not been disputed by the respondent. This Court,
961-CA-11620-2024.odt 1 of 2 therefore, finds no reason to discard the same.
5. However, in view of the fact that there is delay of about more than
a year, the application is allowed with cost of Rs. 3,000/-. Cost is payable to
Advocates Bar Association of High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad.
Appeal be registered.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
bsj
961-CA-11620-2024.odt 2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!