Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2297 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2025
2025:BHC-AS:35290 903-SA-64-2011.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.64 OF 2011
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.151 OF 2011
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.64 OF 2011
Ratnaprabha Shamrao Bhosale ...Appellant
Versus
Ramchandra Maruti Bhosale
since deceased through legal heirs
Shamrao Marutrao Bhosale
since deceased through legal heirs
2a) Dattatray Shamrao Bhosale & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Ajit Kenjale a/w. Mr. Azharuddin Khan, for the Appellant.
Mr. Pradeep Gole, for the Respondent Nos.2a to 2c.
Mr. Vilas B. Tapkir, for the Respondent No.1a.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 14th AUGUST 2025
P. C.:
1. At the outset, Mr. Kenjale, learned Counsel appearing for the
Appellant, on instructions of the Appellant, seeks deletion of the
Respondent No.3. Accordingly, leave is granted to delete the
Respondent No.3.
Page 1 Sonali
903-SA-64-2011.DOC
2. Mr. Kenjale, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant,
Mr. Tapkir, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1(a)
and Mr. Gole, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent
No.2(a) to 2(c) state that the parties have settled the dispute. All
of them tendered the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are
signed by the Appellant-Ratnaprabha Shamrao Bhosale, the
Respondent No.1(a)- Sanjay Suryakant Shitole, Respondent
No.2(a)-Dattatray Shamrao Bhosale, the Respondent No.2(b)-
Mohini Chandrakant Jadhav and the Respondent No.2(c)-Shobha
Bharat Shitole.
3. The Appellant, the Respondent No.1(a) and Respondent
Nos.2(a) to 2(c) are personally present in Court. They state that
the dispute between them is settled in terms of the Consent Terms.
The Consent Terms are also signed by the respective Advocates of
the parties. They identify the signatures of the respective parties.
4. Accordingly, the Consent Terms are taken on record and
marked 'X' for identification. The said Consent Terms read as
under:
Page 2 Sonali
903-SA-64-2011.DOC
Page 3 Sonali
903-SA-64-2011.DOC
Page 4 Sonali
903-SA-64-2011.DOC
Page 5 Sonali
903-SA-64-2011.DOC
Page 6 Sonali
903-SA-64-2011.DOC
Page 7 Sonali
903-SA-64-2011.DOC
Page 8 Sonali
903-SA-64-2011.DOC
Page 9 Sonali
903-SA-64-2011.DOC
5. Various statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted
as undertakings given to this Court.
6. Accordingly, by consent of the parties, Judgment and Decree
dated 29th July 2005 passed by the learned Ciivl Judge, Junior
Division, Khandala in Regular Civil Suit No.195 of 2001 as also the
Judgment and Decree dated 1st September 2010 passed by the
learned Principal District Judge, Satara in Regular Civil Appeal
No.225 of 2005 are quashed and set aside and the said Regular
Civil Suit No.195 of 2001 is decreed in terms of the Consent Terms.
7. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the
Consent Terms.
8. In view of the disposal of the Second Appeal, nothing
survives in the Civil Application and the same is also disposed of.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Digitally signed by SONALI SONALI MILIND MILIND PATIL PATIL Date:
2025.08.14 18:23:37 +0530
Page 10 Sonali
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!