Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shailesh S/O P. Sapkal vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps City ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 25484 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25484 Bom
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024

Bombay High Court

Shailesh S/O P. Sapkal vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps City ... on 5 September, 2024

Author: Vinay Joshi

Bench: Vinay Joshi

2024:BHC-NAG:10053-DB
        940-APL-643-24.odt                                                            1/4


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                             CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.643 OF 2024


         Shailesh s/o P. Sapkal
         Aged about 58 years,
         Occupation - Service,
         R/o Nisarg Park, Toshniwal Layout,
         Akola, Tq. and Dist. Akola                                ... Applicant

         -vs-

         1.     State of Maharashtra,
                Through Police Station Officer,
                Police Station, City Kotwali, Akola
                Tah. and District Akola

         2. Jayprakash s/o Bakelal Mishra,
            Aged about 45 years.
            Occupation - Journalist,
            R/o. Jagjivan Ram Nagar,
            Telephone Colony, Apatapa Road,
            Akola, Tah. and District-Akola                         ... Non-applicants


         Shri Ved R. Deshpande, Advocate for applicant.
         Shri A. M. Joshi, APP for non-applicant No.1/State.
         Shri Mandar R. Deshpande for respondent No.2.

                       CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND MRS VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : September 05, 2024

Oral Judgment : ( Per : Vinay Joshi, J.)

1. Heard.

2. Admit.

3. This is an application seeking to quash the F. I. R. arising out of

Crime No.124/2024 registered with Police Station City Kotwali, Akola for

the offences punishable under Sections 167, 120, 464, 465, 469, 471, 468

of Indian Penal Code read with Section 72 of the Information Technology

Act, 2000 and Section 26 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1985.

4. The informant is an Editor of daily newspaper based at Akola. The

applicant was serving as a Police Inspector and was attached to Crime

Branch at the relevant time. It is informant's case that in order to falsely

implicate the applicant. The applicant under pretext of carrying

investigation in some other crime, had obtained CDR and SDR of the

informant and some other persons. It is alleged that the applicant has

misused his position while serving in the Police Department and procured

personal information by misleading the Authorities. According to the

informant, the said material was collected to either falsely implicate or

blackmail the informant.

5. On the basis of information regarding cognizable offence, the

police have carried investigation and took several steps as necessitated to

collect the material for filing of the final report. In the meantime, it is

stated that the matter has been amicably settled in between the parties.

The informant has filed reply/affidavit stating that though his personal

information i.e. CDR and SDR was obtained, however it was not misused

by the applicant. It is stated that as the informant and the applicant are

residing in the same city, to maintain cordial relations the matter is

settled. The informant has no objection to quash the present

proceedings.

6. The informant is present before us who is identified by his learned

counsel. On our query, the informant reiterated the contents of affidavit

and stated about his no objection to quash the F.I.R. lodged against the

applicant. The learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the

applicant would deposit costs of Rs.25,000/- as the police have carried

out investigation in the matter.

7. Taking overall view of the matter, it is evident that the allegation

is restricted to the collection of CDR and SDR of the informant stating to

be required for some other crimes. There are no allegations that the said

material was used by the applicant with ulterior motive or has passed to

some one else. Looking to the nature of allegations, it cannot be said to

be serious or anti-social offence. Both, the applicant and the informant

are residents of Akola and having cordial relations. Since the matter is

settled, the informant is unwilling to go on with prosecution. Thus the

chances of conviction are bleak. In the circumstances continuation of

prosecution amounts to abuse of the process of the Court.

8. In view of above, the application is allowed. We hereby quash and

set aside the F. I. R. lodged against the applicant in Crime No.124/2024

registered with Police Station City Kotwali, Akola for the offences

punishable under Sections 167, 120, 464, 465, 469, 471, 468 of Indian

Penal Code read with Section 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000

and Section 26 of Indian Telegraph Act, 1985.

9. The applicant shall deposit sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty

Five Thousand) with the High Court Bar Association within a period of

one week from today.

10. Criminal Application No.643/2024 is allowed and disposed of in

above terms. Pending Application (APPP) No.698/2024 also stands

disposed of accordingly.

11. Stand over to 13/09/2024 for reporting compliance.

                                       (Mrs Vrushali V. Joshi, J.)          (Vinay Joshi, J.)




                 Asmita




Signed by: Smt. Asmita A. Bhandakkar
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 06/09/2024 13:16:45
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter