Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 667 Bom
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024
2024:BHC-NAG:370-DB
1 20-wp-796-2023-J.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION No. 796 OF 2023
PETITIONER: : Mrs. Naina Wd/o Ashish Patil,
Age 27 years, R/o C/o Nanaji
Parasramji Raut, Plot No.24, Santoshi
Mata Nagar, Near EPFO Office,
Nagpur, Maharashtra 440024
Vs.
RESPONDENTS : 1 The Managing Director, Maharashtra
State Electricity Distribution Company
Limited, Mahavitaran Company,
Hongkong Bank Building, M.G.Road,
Fort, Mumbai 400001
2 The Managing Director, Maharashtra
State Electricity Distribution Company
Limited, Mahavitaran Company,
Prakashgad, Plot No. G-9, Anant
Kanekar Marg, Bandra (East),
Mumbai - 400051
3 The Executive Engineer, Maharashtra
State Electricity Distribution Company
Limited, i.e. Mahavitaran Company,
Goregaon Division, Goregao, Tahsil
Mangaon, Raigadh 402103
4. Smt. Ratnamala Hemant Patil,
Aged about 55 years,
Occupation : Household,
resident of at Wadad, Post Selsura,
Tahsil and District Wardha
Mr. Aditya Pande, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. A.D. Mohagaonkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3
2 20-wp-796-2023-J.odt
CORAM: AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND
SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, JJ.
DATED : 11th JANUARY, 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard Mr.
Aditya Pande, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.D.
Mohagaonkar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
None appears for the respondent No.4 though served.
2. The petition pertains to the claim of the petitioner
for compassionate appointment on account of demise of her
husband Ashish Patil, who was working with the
respondents. The petitioner is aggrieved by the demand of
NOC by respondent Nos.1 to 3, from the respondent No.4,
the mother-in-law of the petitioner, who appears to have
declined to give the same. The age of the mother-in-law i.e.
respondent No.4 is reported to be 56 years of age and,
therefore, under the policy of compassionate appointment,
she will not be eligible to receive any employment. In that
view of the matter, the insistence of the respondent nos.1 to 3
for NOC from the respondent No.4 would not be justified.
Therefore, in case, the application of the petitioner satisfies 3 20-wp-796-2023-J.odt
the other requirements of the policy, the same shall be
considered by the respondent Nos.1 to 3 in terms of the
policy. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. No
costs.
Rule is made absolute in above terms.
(SMT. M.S.JAWALKAR, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
MP Deshpande
Signed by: Mr. M.P. Deshpande Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 11/01/2024 16:21:18
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!