Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sagar Sahebrao Chavan vs State Of Maharashtra
2024 Latest Caselaw 2678 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2678 Bom
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2024

Bombay High Court

Sagar Sahebrao Chavan vs State Of Maharashtra on 30 January, 2024

Author: Madhav J. Jamdar

Bench: Madhav J. Jamdar

2024:BHC-AS:4446

                                                                                              8 BA 315.24.doc
                                                                                               Dusane


                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 315 OF 2024

                     Sagar Sahebrao Chavan                                  ...Applicant
                          Versus
                     The State of Maharashtra                               ...Respondent

                     Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam, Advocate for the Applicant.
                     Ms. S.S. Kaushik, APP for the Respondent-State.

                                              CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                                              DATED : 30th JANUARY 2024
                    P. C.

                    1.       Heard Mr. Nikam, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant

                    and Ms. Kaushik, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State.

                    2.       This regular Bail Application is preferred under Section 439 of

                    the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The relevant details are as

                    follows:-

                         1. C. R. No.                     607 of 2023
                         2. Date of registration of F.I.R. 24th September 2023
                         3. Name of Police Station        Sinnar, District-Nashik
                         4. Section/s invoked             306, 304-B, 498-A, 342, 406, 323,
                                                          504 and 34 of I.P.C., 1860
                         5. Date of incident              on the intervening night of
                                                          21st September 2023 and
                                                          22nd September 2023.
                         6. Date of arrest                24th November 2023
                         7. Date of filing Charge-sheet 25th November 2023




                                                                                                          1/5


                   ::: Uploaded on - 30/01/2024                    ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2024 06:49:06 :::
                                                                                             8 BA 315.24.doc
                                                                                             Dusane


                 3.      As per the prosecution case, the deceased died by suicide on

                 the intervening night of 21st September 2023 and 22nd September

                 2023. The allegation is that a demand for dowry was made by the

                 Applicant. The Applicant and other accused were not allowing the

                 deceased to visit her parental residence. The deceased was not

                 allowed to talk on cellular phone and she has not been allowed to

                 use separate cellular phone. The Applicant used to forcibly confine

                 the deceased in their matrimonial house by locking the same when

                 he used to go out for his work.

                 4.      It is the contention of Mr. Nikam, learned Counsel appearing

                 for the Applicant that investigation has been completed and that

                 Charge-sheet has been filed on 25th November 2023. He submitted

                 that considerable time will be required for conclusion of trial. He

                 further submitted that except for the statement of family members of

                 the deceased, there is no statement by any outsiders supporting the

                 case of the prosecution.

                 5.      Mr. Nikam, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant has

                 relied on the decision of the Supreme Court of India in the case of

                 Bhagwan Das v. Kartar Singh1. He relied on paragraph no. 15 of the

                 said judgment, which reads as under:

                                  "15. In our opinion the view taken by the High
                                  Court is correct. It often happens that there are
1   (2007) 11 SCC 205


                                                                                                        2/5


               ::: Uploaded on - 30/01/2024                      ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2024 06:49:06 :::
                                                                              8 BA 315.24.doc
                                                                              Dusane


                   disputes and discords in the matrimonial home
                   and a wife is often harassed by the husband or her
                   in-laws. This, however, in our opinion would not
                   by itself and without something more attract
                   Section 306 IPC read with Section 107 IPC."

 6.       On the other hand, Ms. Kaushik, learned APP strongly opposed

 the Bail Application. She submitted that the deceased was not even

 allowed to use a mobile phone. She used to be confined in her

 matrimonial house by the Applicant. A demand for dowry was made

 and therefore the Applicant does not deserve to be enlarged on bail.

 7.       Perusal of the Charge-sheet and statements annexed thereto

 show that the incident had occurred on the intervening night of 21st

 September 2023 and 22nd September 2023. The F.I.R. was lodged on

 24th September 2023. The Applicant was arrested on 24th

 September 2023. The investigation has been completed and Charge-

 sheet has been filed on 21st November 2023. As per the Charge-

 sheet, there are about 20 witnesses proposed to be examined by the

 prosecution. The trial is likely to take a considerably long time.

 8.       Mr. Nikam, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant states

 that as several witnesses are residing in the same locality as that of

 the Applicant, the Applicant will therefore not reside within Taluka-

 Malegaon and Taluka-Sinnar, District-Nashik and that the Applicant

 will reside outside the said area i.e. at his uncle's residence C/o.

 Gorak Shravan Chavan, N/52, AH/2/11/4, Pavan Nagar, Near


                                                                                         3/5


::: Uploaded on - 30/01/2024                      ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2024 06:49:06 :::
                                                                            8 BA 315.24.doc
                                                                            Dusane


 Merchant Bank, C.I.D.C.O., Nashik, District- Nashik.

 9.       The Applicant does not appear to be at risk of flight.

 10.      The Applicant does not have any criminal antecedents.

 11.      Accordingly, the Applicant can be enlarged on bail by imposing

 conditions. In view thereof, the following order:-

                                   ORDER

(a) The Applicant-Sagar Sahebrao Chavan be released

on bail in connection with C. R. No.607 of 2023 registered

with the Sinnar Police Station, Taluka-Sinnar, District-

Nashik on his furnishing P. R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one

or two solvent sureties in the like amount.

(b) The Applicant shall not enter the Malegaon and

Sinnar Taluka, District-Nashik after being released on bail,

except for reporting to the Investigating Officer, if called

and for attending the trial.

(c) On being released on bail, the Applicant shall

furnish his cell phone number and residential address to

the Investigating Officer and shall keep the same updated,

in case of any change thereto.

(d) The Applicant shall report to the Ambad Police

Station, District-Nashik once every month, on first Sunday

between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. till the conclusion of the

8 BA 315.24.doc Dusane

trial. The Police Inspector of Ambad Police Station, District-

Nashik to communicate details thereof to the Investigating

Officer.

(e) The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make

any inducement, threat or promise to any person

acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such

a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or to any

Police personnel.

(f) The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence

and shall not contact or influence the Complainant or any

witnesses in any manner.

(g) The Applicant shall attend the trial regularly. The

Applicant shall co-operate with the Trial Court and shall

not seek unnecessary adjournments thereat.

(h) The Applicant shall surrender his passport, if any,

to the Investigating Officer.

12. The Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter