Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajaykumar Karamveer Mor vs State Of Maharashtra
2024 Latest Caselaw 2676 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2676 Bom
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2024

Bombay High Court

Ajaykumar Karamveer Mor vs State Of Maharashtra on 30 January, 2024

Author: Sarang V. Kotwal

Bench: Sarang V. Kotwal

2024:BHC-AS:4533



                                                    :1:                          12.aba-3595-23.odt

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                            ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3595 OF 2023

                    Ajaykumar Karamveer Mor                              .... Applicant
                              Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra                             .... Respondent
                                                 .....
                                                WITH
                                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13 OF 2024
                                                 IN
                            ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3595 OF 2023

                                            ______
                    Ms. Kusum Pandey, Advocate a/w. Pragati Mishra for the
                    Applicant.
                    Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, APP for the Respondent-State.
                    Ms. Shweta R. Agarwal, Advocate for the Intervenor in
                    IA/13/2024.
                                            ______

                                                      CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

                                                      DATE    : 30th JANUARY, 2024

                    P.C. :

                    1.                  The Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in

                    connection with C.R.No.290/2023 registered at Boisar Police

                    Station, District-Palghar on 19.7.2023 under sections 381 and

                    437 of IPC.



                                                                                              1 of 5



                         Deshmane(PS)




                   ::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024                  ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2024 06:01:01 :::
                                :2:                          12.aba-3595-23.odt

 2.               Heard Ms. Kusum Pandey, learned counsel for the

 Applicant, Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, learned APP for the

 Respondent-State and Ms. Shweta Agarwal, learned counsel

 for the Intervenor in IA/13/2024.


 3.               The FIR is lodged by one Ajay Patil, who was

 working as the H.R. Manager in Karamtara Engineering

 Private Limited, Boisar MIDC. It is alleged in the FIR that the

 present Applicant was working as a Plant Head in that

 Company. He was given laptop, pen-drive etc.. On 14.6.2023,

 the Applicant did not attend his work. Thereafter also he did

 not attend the plant. He was contacted and was told to return

 the laptop, pen-drive etc. He did not return it. Therefore, this

 FIR is lodged on the allegations that the Applicant had

 committed theft of the laptop, hard-disk, pen-drive etc.


 4.               The FIR also alleges that in March, 2023 the

 Applicant had sent a consignment of goods of wrong

 specifications to one foreign company causing heavy loss to

 the informant's company. According to the first informant, the


                                                                         2 of 5




::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024                ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2024 06:01:01 :::
                                :3:                          12.aba-3595-23.odt

 Applicant had committed theft of the laptop, pen-drive and the

 hard-disk worth Rs.62,000/-. On this basis, the FIR is lodged.


 5.               Learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that

 the Applicant had resigned from his job in January, 2023 itself.

 He had reiterated about resignation in June, 2023 by sending

 WhatsApp messages.            He had also informed that some

 employees had given threats of his life. All this was ignored

 and this false FIR is lodged. She submitted that the Applicant

 was not treated properly in the company. He has sent the

 laptop through courier. He had no intention to commit any

 theft.


 6.               Learned counsel for the informant submitted that

 the Applicant has used the sensitive data from the hard-disk.

 He had sent the laptop, but, the hard-disk was missing. This

 has caused serious loss to the company as the sensitive data

 was sold to their rivals.




                                                                         3 of 5




::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024                ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2024 06:01:01 :::
                                :4:                           12.aba-3595-23.odt

 7.               Learned APP submitted that the Applicant needs to

 cooperate with the investigation and give full information of

 the background.


 8.               I have considered these submissions. From the FIR

 it appears to be a dispute between the company and its former

 employee. The Applicant had sent the laptop through courier.

 Therefore, to that extent the grievance of the first informant

 was taken care of. As far as the allegations regarding theft of

 the data is concerned, those allegations are vague. The FIR

 does not mention even indirectly as to what that data related

 to.    The allegations are general and vague.           As far as the

 allegations of causing loss to the company because of his act is

 concerned, it could be an error of judgment on his part but

 that by itself may not amount to an offence.


 9.               Considering the background and the strained

 relationship between the first informant's company and the

 Applicant as its former employee, the custodial interrogation

 of the Applicant is not necessary. He will have to cooperate

 with the investigation.
                                                                          4 of 5




::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024                 ::: Downloaded on - 01/02/2024 06:01:01 :::
                                       :5:                             12.aba-3595-23.odt

 10.                Hence, the following order :

                                        ORDER

(i) In the event of his arrest in connection with C.R.No.290/2023 registered at Boisar Police Station, District-Palghar, the Applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing PR bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

(ii) The Applicant shall attend the concerned police station from 20.2.2024 to 23.2.2024 between 1.00 p.m. to 5.00 p.m. and thereafter as and when called. The Applicant shall cooperate with the investigation.

(iii) If the Applicant does not attend the concerned police station as directed, the informant and the investigating agency are at liberty to file an application for cancellation of this order.

(iv) Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of accordingly. The Application for intervention is also disposed of.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Deshmane (PS)

5 of 5

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter