Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1420 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2024
904-wp15699-2022.doc
SA Pathan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.15699 OF 2022
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.14797 OF 2023
Narendra Ramprakash Podar & Ors. ... Petitioners
V/s.
Pragnesh Narayan Podar & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr. Girish S. Godbole, Sr. Advocate a/w Mr. Sanket
Dhawan a/w Ms.Priyanka Bhandari for the petitioners.
Mr. Abhay Khandeparkar, Sr. Advocate i/by Mr. Prerak
Sharma a/w Mr. Mihir U. Dedhia a/w Ms. Apporva A.
Khandeparkar, for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : JANUARY 19, 2024 P.C.:
1. Arguable questions are raised. Hence, Rule.
2. The questions which arise for consideration is, whether a person claiming to be son of deceased Trustee can be termed as either Trustee or beneficiary in view of the language of the trust deed and whether at his instance the revision under Section 70A of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 could have been entertained by the Charity Commissioner.
3. According to the petitioner, the judgment in the case of Maganlal Himatram Barfiwala and Others Vs. Mridangraj Hiralal
904-wp15699-2022.doc
Suchak, reported in 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 336 covers the issue.
4. Hence, there shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause
(c).
5. Learned Senior Advocate for petitioners states that, he has instructions not to press for interim relief in terms of prayer clause
(d) in this petition and to raise such relief in appropriate proceeding. Liberty as prayed is granted.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!