Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 22897 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2024
2024:BHC-AUG:17524-DB
928wp8236-24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
928 WRIT PETITION NO. 8236 OF 2024
PRAVIN ASHOK BHADAK
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Sanket N. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for the Respondents State
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : 6th August, 2024
ORDER:
1. The only prayer put forth by the Petitioner in this Petition is
that though the transfer order dated 27.07.2023, has been issued by the
competent authority, thereby transferring the Petitioner from Kalyan to
Dhule, yet, the Petitioner is not being relieved from his present posting
at Kalyan by Respondent No.4. It is also submitted that his transfer
order was also defended before the learned Maharashtra Administrative
Tribunal in Original Application No. 730 of 2023, The issue as
regards Section 10 of the Maharashtra Government Servants
(Regulation of Transfers and Prevention of Delay in Discharge of Official
Duties) Act, 2005 could have an effect on the conduct of the
Respondent.
2. The Petitioner's Original Application (Transfer Application No.
25 of 2024), is before the learned Tribunal. The interim application
928wp8236-24
was heard and an order was passed on 25.07.2024, vide which, the
learned Tribunal declined to issue any interim orders. The matter is
now posted for a final hearing, on 26.08.2024.
3. It is a weird situation wherein an authority competent to
transfer the Petitioner, has issued a transfer order on 27.07.2023 and is
not effecting the same. When the said transfer order was challenged in
Original Application No. 730 of 2023, the Department stoutly defended
the order. With the passage of one year and ten days, the Petitioner is
still not relieved and is on tenter-hooks. His aged father is taking
treatment at Dhule. It is, therefore, prayed that either the post on
which he is being transferred at Dhule be kept vacant or the learned
Tribunal be requested to decide the application of the Petitioner,
expeditiously.
4. In view of the above, we request the learned Tribunal to
consider the plight of the Petitioner and hear the parties on 26 th August,
2024 and endeavour to deliver a judgment, as early as possible. The
issue raised by the Petitioner that Respondent No.4 is answerable for
the delay in discharge of official duties in view of Section 10 of the
2005 Act, is kept open for the Tribunal to consider.
5. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner contends that once
the transfer order has been issued on 27.07.2023, the Petitioner cannot
928wp8236-24
be transferred for a period of three years. This aspect will also be
considered by the Tribunal.
6. With the above observations and request, this Writ Petition is
disposed off.
( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
JPChavan
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!