Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Samrat Ashok Shah (Wrongly Mentioned As ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 22895 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 22895 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2024

Bombay High Court

Samrat Ashok Shah (Wrongly Mentioned As ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso, Ps, ... on 6 August, 2024

Author: Vinay Joshi

Bench: Vinay Joshi

2024:BHC-NAG:8795-DB




                                                     1                  apl937.2024

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

                        CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.937/2024

              1.   Samrat Ashok Shah (wrongly mentioned
                   as Samrat Shah Sagar Shah in first
                   information report), age 34,
                   Medical Practitioner, R/o 404, Kumar
                   Shridhar Society, Opposite Fashion
                   Factory, Mukund Nagar, Pune 411 037.

              2.   Sagar Ashok Shah,
                   age 36, Occ. Dentist,
                   R/o 404, Kumar Shridhar Society,
                   Opposite Fashion Factory,
                   Mukund Nagar, Pune 411 037.

              3.   Prashant Ramesh Shah,
                   age 56, Occ. Private,
                   R/o D 503, DSK Chandradeep Society,
                   Mukund Nagar, Pune 411 037.                  ...   Applicants
                       - Versus -

              1.   State of Maharashtra,
                   through Police Station Officer,
                   Police Station Akola, Distt.
                   Nagpur (Railway).

              2.   Manjusha Laxmanrao Dhole (Dhake),
                   age 38, Occ. Assistant Police Inspector,
                   R/o Sant Dnyaneshwar Ward at Post
                   Hinganghat, Distt. Wardha presently
                   Resident C/o Rajesh Kelekar, behind
                   Central Bank, Chaprashipura,
                   Distt. Amravati.                      ...   Non-applicants
                                       2                  apl937.2024

            -----------------
Mr. R. R. Vyas, Advocate for the Applicants.
Ms. M.H. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Non-applicant No.1/State.
Mr. P.V. Navlani, Advocate for Non-applicant No.2.
           ----------------
CORAM: VINAY JOSHI & MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ .
DATED: 6.8.2024.




ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Vinay Joshi, J.)

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

Heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties.

2. This is an application seeking to quash F.I.R. in Crime

No.0127/2024 registered by non-applicant No.1 for the offence

punishable under Sections 143, 294, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal

Code on account of settlement.

3. The incident, in short, is that on 24.3.2023 while the

informant lady was travelling with her brother by train there was

oral altercation in the passengers i.e. in between informant and

applicant along with her companions. On the basis of said 3 apl937.2024

occurrence informant has lodged report with Police Station

Bhusawal Railway which was transferred to Nagpur Railway

Police Station.

4. It is informed that on the basis of same occurrence

counter F.I.R. No.0130/2024 was also lodged by Shital Shaha in

which applicant and her brothers are accused. Since the

occurrence was in between unknown passengers obviously there

was no intention and as the cross cases are filed wisdom prevailed

on both sides to settle the matter. Having regard to the nature of

occurrence we see no difficulty in accepting the settlement for

quashing. Informant Manjusha is present before us who is

identified by her Advocate. She stated that since the applicants

and their companions apologized she do not wish to prosecute

further.

5. It reveals that the incident arose abruptly in between

co-passengers. The offence cannot be termed as grave or

antisocial. Now the matter is settled. Thus, the continuation of

prosecution would amount to abuse of process of law.

4 apl937.2024

6. Learned Advocate Mr. Vyas would submit that the

applicants would deposit costs of Rs.25,000/- for rotating the

police machinery.

7. In view of the above, application is allowed.

We hereby quash and set aside F.I.R. in Crime

No.0127/2024 registered by non-applicant No.1 for the offence

punishable under Sections 143, 294, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal

Code.

The applicants shall deposit costs of Rs.25,000/- with

High Court Bar Association, Nagpur within one week from today.

Stand over to 19.8.2024 for noting compliance.

MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)

Tambaskar.

Signed by: MR. N.V. TAMBASKAR Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 12/08/2024 11:20:01

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter