Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ranjan Rupasi Nisar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2024 Latest Caselaw 22118 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 22118 Bom
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2024

Bombay High Court

Ranjan Rupasi Nisar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 1 August, 2024

Author: Neela Gokhale

Bench: A. S. Gadkari, Neela Gokhale

2024:BHC-AS:30751-DB

                 rdg                                                 19-wp-2752-2024-J.doc

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2752 OF 2024

            Ranjan Rupasi Nisar
            Age: 40 years, Occ: Teacher,
            Residing at 5th Floor, Near Reserve Bank,
            Dosa House, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001.
            And at Kandivali, (W), Greater Mumbai,
            City Maharashtra, India.                                  .....Petitioner
                  Vs.
            1.    The State of Maharashtra,
                  Through Police Inspector,
                  Kandivali Police Station,
                  Mumbai - 400 067.

            2.         Dhara Dipen Shah,
                       Age: 42 years, Housewife,
                       Res. 2/43, Humlog Society,
                       Shankar Lane, Kandivali West,
                       Mumbai                                         .....Respondents

            Mr. Jenish D. Jain, for the Petitioners.
            Mr. Vinod Chate APP, for Respondent No.1-State.
            Mr. Anup Kamble, for Respondent No.2.
            Mr. R. B. Yadav, Notary in person present.

                                              CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            DR NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
                                              DATE      :   1st AUGUST, 2024.
            JUDGMENT :

(Per Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)

1) Petitioner seeks to quash and set aside F.I.R.No.285 of 2024

dated 10th April 2024 registered with Kandivali Police Station for offenses

punishable under Sections 500, 506, 509 of the Indian Penal Code,1860

("IPC") along with Sections 67 and 67(A) of the Information Technology

Act, 2000 filed by Respondent No.2.

      rdg                                                19-wp-2752-2024-J.doc

2)          Petitioner and the elder brother (Mr. Hemal) of the Respondent

No. 2 herein are friends, thus were acquainted with each other.

3) It is the contention of the parties that, on account of some

misunderstandings between them, Respondent No.2 filed the FIR leading to

the impugned proceedings. However, now they have cleared the

misunderstanding and are desirous of settling the matter. In fact, the

Petitioner and Respondent No.2 have accordingly filed Consent Terms dated

17th May 2024 and have agreed to amicably settle all the disputes.

4) Respondent No.2 has also given her consent to quash the FIR

impugned herein vide Affidavit dated 17 th May 2024. Mr. Anup Kamble,

learned counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2 on instructions states that

she has no objection to quash the FIR.

5) Considering the facts in the present case and the consent

Affidavit of Respondent No. 2, we are inclined to quash F.I.R.No.285 of

2024 dated 10th April 2024 registered with Kandivali Police Station for

offenses punishable under Sections 500, 506, 509 of the I.P.C. and Sections

67 and 67(A) of the IT Act filed by Respondent No.2.

6) As we expressed our opinion for quashing of F.I.R.No.285 of

2024 dated 10th April 2024 registered with Kandivali Police Station for

offenses punishable under Sections 500, 506, 509 of the I.P.C. and Sections

67 and 67(A) of the IT Act, learned Advocate for Petitioner on instructions

rdg 19-wp-2752-2024-J.doc

submitted that, the Petitioner will pay a cost of Rs.25,000/- to the Central

Police Welfare Fund of Maharashtra Police within a period of two weeks

from the date of uploading of the present Order on the official website of

High Court of Bombay. The said statement is accepted as an undertaking to

the Court.

7) In view thereof, we direct the Petitioner to pay a cost of

Rs.25,000/- to the Central Police Welfare Fund within a period of two

weeks from the date of uploading of present Order on the official website of

High Court of Bombay.

7.1) Details of the bank account for payment of cost are as under :-

             Bank Name         :- Axis Bank Limited.

             Branch Name       :- Worli, Mumbai (M.H.), Mumbai-400 025

             Account Name      :- Central Police Welfare Fund

             Account Number :- 914010029005759

             IFSC Code         :- UTIB0000060

7.2)         Petitioner to deposit the said cost of Rs.25,000/- within

stipulated period as noted above and submit receipt of the same in the

Registry of this Court.

8) In view of above and subject to payment of cost, Petition is

allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a).

9) It is made clear that, if the cost is not paid by the Petitioner

within stipulated period as mentioned above, the Petition shall stand

rdg 19-wp-2752-2024-J.doc

revived automatically and, in that event, the Investigating Officer shall

complete the investigation of the present crime expeditiously.

10) List the Petition on board on 19th August 2024, under caption

'for reporting compliance' of present Order.

                                 (DR NEELA GOKHALE, J.)                  (A.S. GADKARI, J.)




Signed by: Raju D. Gaikwad

Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 02/08/2024 19:36:07
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter