Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10674 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2023
2023:BHC-NAG:15228
1 14-6720-23-J.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 6720 OF 2023
PETITIONER : Sujata W/o Jayendra Waghmare
Age : 37 years, Occup. : Housewife,
R/o : C/o : Sadashiv Vithoba Patil,
Saint Tukdoji Ward, Mukkam Post :
Hinganghat, District : Wardha
VERSUS
RESPONDENT : Jayendra s/o Ghanshyam Waghmare,
Age : 42 years, Occup. : Advocate R/o Behind Old Devli Naka, Near Honda Showroom, Devli Road, Dayal Nagar, Wardha
Mr. R.D. Hajare, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.S. Moon, Advocate for Respondent
CORAM: AVINASH G. GHAROTE , J.
DATED : 16th OCTOBER, 2023
ORAL JUDGMENT :
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard
finally with the consent of learned counsel for the
parties.
2. The petition challenges an order under
Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, whereby
Hindu Marriage Petition No.215/2021, which is
pending with Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wardha, has 2 14-6720-23-J.odt
been declined to be transferred to Civil Judge, Senior
Division, Hinganghat. It is not disputed by Mr. Moon,
learned counsel for the respondent, that domestic
violence proceeding are already instituted at
Hinganghat in which on receipt of notice, the
respondent is appearing. He further contends, that the
petitioner is already receiving expenses on account of
transportation from Hinganghat to Wardha and,
therefore, the application has been rightly rejected.
Considering that the petitioner has already instituted
proceedings under the Protection of Women from
Domestic Violence Act at Hinganghat, it would be apt if
Hindu Marriage Petition No. 215/2021 is also
transferred to Hinganghat, where-in both of them, the
respondent can appear conveniently. Merely because,
the petitioner is receiving transportation charges that
by itself cannot be a ground to reject the application as
considering the petitioner has a small child of 5 years,
it would be inconvenient for her to travel, whereas
there is no such impediment about the respondent. Mr.
Hajare, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon 3 14-6720-23-J.odt
instructions, makes a statement that the petitioner
would not be claiming the transportation charges. The
statement is accepted. Though judgment in the case of
Abhilasha Gupta Vs. Harimohan Gupta, Transfer
Petition (Civil) No.1027/2021 decided on 24/09/2021
has been relied upon by Mr. Moon, learned counsel for
the respondent, that merely indicates in para 20 the
factors to be considered while deciding an application
for transfer. Bearing those in mind and the convenience
of the petitioner, who has a 5 year old child, in my
considered opinion, the impugned order cannot be
sustained and the same is hereby quashed and set aside
and the application under Section 24 of the Code of
Civil Procedure filed by the petitioner is allowed. The
petition is allowed. Hindu Marriage Petition
No.215/2021 pending on the file of 5th Jt. Civil Judge,
Senior Division, Wardha is hereby transferred the Civil
Judge, Senior Division, Hinganghat.
3. The parties shall appear before the Civil
Judge, Senior Division, Hinganghat on 30th October,
2023, without any further notice. The petitioner shall 4 14-6720-23-J.odt
file a copy of this order before the 5 th Jt. Civil Judge,
Senior Division, Wardha to intimate the said Court
regarding the transfer and so also enable the said Court
to transmit the record and proceedings to the Civil
Judge, Senior Division, Hinganghat well within time.
No costs.
Rule is made absolute in the above terms.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) MP Deshpande
Signed by: Mr. M.P. Deshpande Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 17/10/2023 12:07:03
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!