Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6992 Bom
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2023
237-fa-347-2012.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 347 OF 2012
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2061 OF 2012
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 347 OF 2012
Vaishali Darshak Ghegadmal ... Appellant
Versus
Taibai Santosh Ghegadmal ... Respondent
.....
Mrs. Vaishali Darshak Ghegadmal in person present.
Mr. Gulabrao Awasarmol i/b Mr. Viplav Khobragade, for the
Respondent.
.....
CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.
DATED : 13th JULY, 2023.
P.C.
The appellant in person is present before the Court. She
submits that Advocate Ms. Usha Purohit engaged by her had winded
up and left for Goa.
2 The appellant further submits that she does not wish to
prosecute the Appeal by stating whatever would be the judgment
delivered by this Court would be acceptable to her.
Rekha Patil 1 of 2
237-fa-347-2012.doc
3 However, in the interest of justice one more opportunity is
granted to the appellant to reconsider her request as to whether she
wish to prosecute the Appeal or otherwise and make an appropriate
statement on the next date. The appellant has tendered a copy of
the Pan Card, identity card issued by the Municipal Corporation of
Greater Bombay as well as identity card issued by the Income Tax
Department, in proof of her identity.
4 List on 20th July, 2023.
[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]
Rekha Patil 2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!