Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manoj Mukinda Ahiwale vs State Of Maharashtra
2023 Latest Caselaw 829 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 829 Bom
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2023

Bombay High Court
Manoj Mukinda Ahiwale vs State Of Maharashtra on 24 January, 2023
Bench: S. V. Kotwal
                                                           1 of 4                 10-ia-305-23


                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 305 OF 2023
                                                    IN
                                      CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2023

                     Manoj Mukinda Ahiwale                                  ..Applicant
                          Versus
                     The State of Maharashtra                               ..Respondent

                                                  __________
                     Smt. Manisha Devkar for Appellant.
                     Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for State/Respondent.
                                                  __________

                                               CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
                                               DATE : 24 JANUARY 2023
                     PC :

                     1.           This is an application for bail pending final disposal of

                     Criminal Appeal No.67 of 2023 preferred by the applicant. The

                     prosecution case is that, on 31/10/2009, the applicant burst the

                     fire crackers in the Court. They were described in Marathi as

                     'sutali bomb'. He also distributed some pamphlets. He was

                     shouting some slogans. He was caught on the spot.


                     2.           Learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that the

                     incident is old which had taken place in the year 2009. The

                     sentence is short and the Appeal is not likely to be decided within
        Digitally
        signed by
        VINOD
VINOD   BHASKAR
BHASKAR GOKHALE
GOKHALE Date:
        2023.01.27
        10:47:11
        +0530
                      Gokhale
                                     2 of 4                  10-ia-305-23


one year. There are no independent witnesses. All the witnesses

are the court employees. She submitted that, even if it is assumed

that he had burst the fire crackers, his state of mind may be taken

into consideration. She submitted that the Charge was not framed

U/s.286 of the I.P.C. and yet he was convicted under that section.

The ingredients of Section 353 of the I.P.C. are not made out.


3.        Learned APP opposed this application. He submitted that

the offence is serious and his conduct should not be condoned.


4.        I have considered these submissions. The applicant was

convicted by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Satara vide his

Judgment and order dated 30/11/2022 in Sessions Case No.259 of

2019. The applicant was convicted for commission of offence

punishable U/s.353 of the I.P.C. and was sentenced to suffer R.I.

for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of

payment of fine to suffer S.I. for one month. He was convicted for

offence punishable U/s.286 of the I.P.C. and was sentenced to

suffer R.I. for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- and in

default of payment of fine to suffer S.I. for one month. He was
                                      3 of 4                   10-ia-305-23


acquitted from the charges of offence U/s.336 of the I.P.C. and

under section 3 of the Explosive Substance Act, 1908.


5.        I have considered the submissions of both learned

counsel. I have also perused the copies of the depositions annexed

to this application. The applicant was acquitted from the charges

of Section 3 of the Explosive Substance Act, 1908, because,

according to learned Judge, the permission of the competent

authority to prosecute him under that Act was not properly

proved. He has observed that, though, charge was not framed

U/s.286 of the I.P.C., it is a minor offence compared to Section 336

of the I.P.C. This proposition is debatable. It will have to be decided

whether the offence U/s.353 of the I.P.C. is made out. Having said

that, the offence is not minor, but the State has not taken any

steps. It is for the State to take appropriate steps in connection

with these allegations. The offence is old. Since 2009, there are no

allegations that the applicant has committed any further offence or

caused any disturbance. The applicant was on bail during trial. He

has not misused that liberty. Even after his conviction he was

granted bail under the provision of Section 389 of the Cr.p.c. The
                                     4 of 4                 10-ia-305-23


Appeal is not likely to be decided with a period of one year; which

is the major punishment imposed on him. Considering these

aspects, the applicant can be granted bail pending his Appeal; with

certain conditions.


6.        Hence, the following order:


                                      ORDER

i) During pendency and final disposal of Criminal

Appeal No.67 of 2023, the Applicant is directed to

be released on bail on his furnishing P. R. bond in

the sum of Rs.30000/- with one or two sureties in

the like amount.

ii) The Applicant shall report to the concerned police

station once in a month for a period of six months

from today.

iii)The Application is disposed of.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter