Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maharashtra State Road Transport ... vs Prakash S/O Premnath Rewatkar
2023 Latest Caselaw 543 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 543 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2023

Bombay High Court
Maharashtra State Road Transport ... vs Prakash S/O Premnath Rewatkar on 16 January, 2023
Bench: Avinash G. Gharote
wp 4226.17.                                                                                         1/2


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

                                       Writ Petition No.4226/2017
                                       MSRTC, Nagpur V Prakash
***********************************************************************************
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders                     Court's or Judge's Orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
***********************************************************************************
                Mr. V.H. Kedar, Adv. for petitioner.
                Mr. C.V. Jagdale, Adv. for respondent.

                                         CORAM : AVINASH G GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 16-01-2023

The petition questions the judgment dated 06-02-16 passed by the learned Industrial Court (pg 27) whereby the petitioner is directed to calculate the salary of the complainant by adding all increments from 01- 04-03 (the date of termination) to 27-01-09 (the date of reinstatement) and pay the salary to the complainant with all consequential benefits within a period of 3 months.

2. Mr Kedar, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the earlier proceeding namely ULP No.21/05 decided on 31-12-08 (pg 13), by the Labour Court the reinstatement was directed without backwages but with continuity of service. That being the position, the second complaint namely ULP No.138/11, seeking backwages was clearly not maintainable, considering which impugned judgment dated 06-02-16

wp 4226.17. 2/2

(pg 27) is hereby quashed and set aside.

3. Needless to mention that the respondent shall be entitled to all the benefits of continuity in service as directed by the learned Labour Court in the judgment dated 31-12-2008.

JUDGE Deshmukh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter