Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Il And Fs Financial Services Ltd vs Pallav Trading Pvt. Ltd. And 8 Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 104 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 104 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2023

Bombay High Court
Il And Fs Financial Services Ltd vs Pallav Trading Pvt. Ltd. And 8 Ors on 4 January, 2023
Bench: R. I. Chagla
           Digitally signed
           by JITENDRA
JITENDRA SHANKAR
SHANKAR NIJASURE
NIJASURE Date:
         2023.01.06
           18:29:34 +0530




                                                                      22-comss-598-2019.doc

jsn
                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    ORDINARY ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION
                                        IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

                                     COMS SUMMARY SUIT NO.598 OF 2019
                                                 WITH
                                   SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.77 OF 2019

          IL & FS Financial Services Ltd.                                   ...Plaintiffs

                              Versus

          Pallav Trading Private Ltd. & Ors.                                ...Defendants

                                                      ----------
          Purvi Joshi with Gaurav Suryavanshi i/b. DSK Legal for the Plaintiffs.
          Amrut Joshi with Leona Furtado i/b. Pan India Legal Services LLP for
          Defendant Nos.2 and 9.
                                                      ----------

                                              CORAM :         R.I. CHAGLA J.

                                              DATE        :   4TH JANUARY, 2023.

          ORDER :

1. The learned Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff has

referred to order dated 22nd June, 2022 passed by this Court in

Summons for Judgment No.77 of 2019 filed in the Commercial

Summary Suit. By said order the Defendant Nos.2 and 9 were subject

to deposit a sum of Rs.277,50,00,000/- within a period of twelve

weeks from the date of the said order. Conditional upon

22-comss-598-2019.doc

deposit, leave was granted to defend the Suit. In the event the said

sum was deposited, the Written Statement was permitted to be filed

within a period of two weeks thereafter. In the event the said sum

was not deposited, it was kept open for the Plaintiff to seek

appropriate directions in the matter subject to payment of deficit

stamp duty comprising the documents being Exhibits A to I of the

Plaint. The Prothonotary and Senior Master of this Court was

directed to send the documents to Collector of Stamps for

appropriate orders of adjudication and upon such adjudication duty

was to be paid within a period of four weeks from the date of such

adjudication.

2. This Court is apprised of this fact that the said sum has

not been deposited by the Defendant Nos.2 and 9.

3. The learned Counsel appearing for the Plaintiffs has

informed this Court that the documents being Exhibit A to J are still

be adjudicated for the purpose of deficit stamp duty as directed by

this Court in the said Order.

4. She has informed this Court that Defendant Nos.3 and 7

have been served and Affidavit of Service dated 10th January, 2020

22-comss-598-2019.doc

has been filed. However, upon perusing the Court record it is noted

that Affidavit of Service has not been accepted on account of it being

defective. In so far as the other Defendants are concerned i.e.

Defendant Nos.1, 4, 5, 6 and 8, the service has not been effected and

accordingly the learned Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff has

sought for permission for substituted service.

5. The learned Counsel appearing for the Defendant Nos.2

and 9 has sought time in order to take out appropriate application for

permission to deposit the said sum which till has date not been

deposited. He has submitted that an attempt will be made to

amicably settle the matter with the Plaintiff.

6. It is noted that, the Defendant Nos.2 and 9 have not

complied with the said order dated 22nd June, 2022. By the said

order which it was provided that if the said sum was not deposited by

the Defendant Nos.2 and 9 within a period of twelve weeks from the

date of the said order. It would be open for the Plaintiffs to seek

appropriate orders in the matter. This would be subject to payment of

deficit stamp duty comprising the documents being Exhibits A to I of

the Plaint, for which process is ongoing. Thus, it would be

appropriate to stand over the matter.

22-comss-598-2019.doc

7. Prior to the next date, the Plaintiffs are granted

opportunity to serve the Defendants who till date have not been

served by way of substituted service, paper publication through

widely circulated newspapers, one in Free Press Journal (in English

language) and the other in Maharashtra Times (in Marathi language)

within a period of three weeks from the date of this Order.

8. The Defendant Nos.2 and 9 shall be at liberty to take out

appropriate application, if instructed, and which shall be filed prior

to the next date.

9. The Commercial Summary Suit shall be placed on 8th

February, 2023.

[R.I. CHAGLA J.]

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter