Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1364 Bom
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2023
1/3 31-IA-4505-&-4506-22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4505 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1295 OF 2022
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4506 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1295 OF 2022
Samshuddin Salauddin Shaikh .... Applicant
versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents
.......
• Mr. D. V. Saroj i/b. Raeesuddin Khan, Advocate for Applicant.
• Smt. M. R. Tidke, APP for State/Respondent No.1.
• Ms. Ruchi Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE : 08th FEBRUARY, 2023
P.C. :
1. This is an application for bail pending final disposal of
the Criminal Appeal No.1295 of 2022 preferred by the
Applicant. The Applicant was convicted and sentenced by the
Special Judge under POCSO, Greater Mumbai, vide his
Judgment and Order dated 07/12/2022 passed in POCSO
Digitally
signed by
Special Case No.14 of 2017.
MANUSHREE
MANUSHREE V
V NESARIKAR
NESARIKAR Date:
2023.02.10
14:22:09
+0530
Nesarikar
2/3 31-IA-4505-&-4506-22.odt
2. The Applicant was convicted for commission of offence
punishable u/s 354 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced
to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of
Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to suffer rigorous
imprisonment of two months.
3. Heard Mr. D. V. Saroj, learned counsel for the
Applicant, Ms. Ruchi Singh, learned counsel for the Respondent
No.2 and Smt. M. R. Tidke, learned APP for the State.
4. Learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that the
Applicant was on bail during trial and he has not misused the
same. Even after his conviction he was granted bail u/s 389 of
Cr.P.C. He invited my attention to the evidence of the victim who
is examined as P.W.2. After narrating the incident that the
offender had touched her cheeks and put his hand on her waist;
she did not identify the Appellant before the Court. Learned
counsel therefore submitted that there is no evidence against the
Appellant.
3/3 31-IA-4505-&-4506-22.odt
5. Learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 does not
have objection for granting bail to the Applicant.
6. Learned APP accepted that the sentence is short.
7. I have considered these submissions. The Applicant
does have good case on merits. The sentence imposed is short.
The Appeal is not likely to be decided within that short period.
8. Considering this background, the Applicant can be
granted bail during pendency of his Appeal.
9. Hence, the following order :
ORDER
(i) During pendency and final disposal of the Criminal Appeal No.1295 of 2022, the Applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only), with one or two sureties in the like amount.
(ii) Interim Application stands disposed of accordingly.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!