Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1256 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2023
38.FCA.31.2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.31 OF 2020
RAHUL ANNASAHEB FALKE
VERSUS
PRIYADARSHANI RAHUL FALKE
...
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Nitin T. Tribhuwan
AGP for Respondents: Mr. Parag V. Barde
...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND
S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.
DATE : 06.02.2023
PER COURT :
We have heard both the sides.
2. The husband is before us challenging the order passed by the
family court rejecting his petition for restitution of conjugal rights preferred
under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956.
3. The learned advocates of both the sides are unanimous that
apart from the order under challenge, there was a decree for divorce as well
in petition filed by the wife. Since that judgment and order has not been
appealed against, that has reached finality.
4. Once it is admitted that the decree of divorce has reached
finality, this appeal which merely challenges the order of the family court
refusing restitution becomes infructuous.
5. The appeal is disposed of.
(S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
habeeb 1/1
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!