Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashwinikunal Ashokkumar Singh vs State Of Maharashtra
2023 Latest Caselaw 13130 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13130 Bom
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2023

Bombay High Court

Ashwinikunal Ashokkumar Singh vs State Of Maharashtra on 20 December, 2023

Author: Revati Mohite Dere

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere, Gauri Godse

           Digitally
           signed by
           SHAGUFTA
   2023:BHC-AS:39147-DB
SHAGUFTA   QUTBUDDIN
QUTBUDDIN PATHAN
PATHAN     Date:                                                                    15-IA-2734-2023.doc
           2023.12.19
           00:40:54
           +0530
                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2734 OF 2023
                                                     (For Bail)
                                                        IN
                                         CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 845 OF 2023


                    Ashwinikunal Ashokkumar Singh                         ...Applicant
                         Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra                              ...Respondent


                    Mr. Mohammed Umar Kazi a/w Mr. Abdul Wahab Shaikh for the
                    Applicant

                    Mr. J. P. Yagnik, Addl.P.P for the Respondent-State

                                                       CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
                                                               GAURI GODSE, JJ.
                                                       WEDNESDAY, 20th DECEMBER 2023

                    ORAL ORDER (Per Revati Mohite Dere,J.) :
                    1                 Heard learned counsel for the parties.



                    2                 By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of

his sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and

final disposal of his aforesaid appeal.

15-IA-2734-2023.doc

3 The applicant, vide judgment and order dated 19 th

June, 2023, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge at

Kalyan, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 128/2015, has been

convicted alongwith other co-accused as under:

-- for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the

Indian Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life

and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- each, in default, to suffer

rigorous imprisonment for six months;

-- for the offence punishable under Section 120B r/w 34

of the Indian Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment

for life and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- each, in default, to

suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months;

-- for the offence punishable under Section 394 r/w 34

of the Indian Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment

for ten years and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/- each, in default,

to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months;

15-IA-2734-2023.doc

-- for the offence punishable under Section 449 r/w 34

of the Indian Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment

for ten years and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default, to

suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months;

All the aforesaid sentences were directed to run

concurrently.

4 Perused the papers. The prosecution case rests

entirely on circumstantial evidence. As far as the applicant is

concerned, the prosecution has relied on three circumstances qua

the said applicant, i.e. (i) recovery of articles i.e. imitation

jewellery of the deceased and a cutter i.e. the weapon with which

the deceased was assaulted, at the instance of the applicant;

(ii) extra-judicial confession made by A1-Virendra to PW11-

Siddhesh Bane; and (iii) the evidence of PW7-Kalpana Borole to

show that the applicant alongwith A1, had visited her residence

with intent to commit robbery/theft, prior to the incident in

question.

15-IA-2734-2023.doc

5 Learned counsel for the applicant also seeks bail on

the ground of parity. He submits that the applicant stands on a

better footing than that of co-accused - Virendra, whose sentence

has been suspended and who has been enlarged on bail by this

Court vide order dated 27th September 2023.

6 Learned A.P.P does not dispute the fact that the role

of the applicant is similar to that of A1 i.e. Virendra, whose

sentence has been suspended and who has been enlarged on bail.

7 Perused the papers. As far as PW11- Siddhesh is

concerned, the said witness, in his examination-in-chief, has

alleged that the applicant had made an extra-judicial confession

to him, however, in his cross-examination, the said witness has

clearly stated that he had not stated the same in his 161

statement. The relevant paragraphs of the evidence of PW 11 are

paras 15 and 16, in which the omissions have been recorded.

15-IA-2734-2023.doc

8 As far as the evidence of PW7-Kalpana is concerned,

she has stated that the applicant alongwith his friend had come at

her residence and had asked for water, however, since one of her

friend stopped by, at her residence, the applicant and his friend

left, after drinking water. She has further stated that when she

was alone in the house after Diwali Festival, she read in the

newspaper that the said boys who had come to her house, were

involved in the murder of one lady. PW7 - Kalpana in her cross-

examination, in paragraph 11 has admitted that she had not told

anything about the accused coming to her house for drinking

water. Her evidence shows that no Test Identification Parade was

held for identification of the accused and that she came to know

the names of the accused from the police.

9 As far as recovery of articles at the instance of the

applicant i.e. imitation jewellery and a cutter, admittedly the CA

report has not been placed on record by the prosecution.

15-IA-2734-2023.doc

10 We have perused the order dated 27 th September

2023 suspending the sentence and enlarging the co-accused-

Virendra, on bail. The evidence against the applicant is similar to

that of co-accused-Virendra.

11 Admittedly, the applicant has no antecedents. The

applicant is in custody since 23 rd October, 2014. The possibility

of the appeal being heard in the immediate near future also

appears to be bleak.

12 Considering the aforesaid evidence on record qua the

applicant as stated aforesaid, the application is allowed and the

applicant's sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail on

the following terms and conditions:

ORDER

i) The applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing

P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one or two

sureties in the like amount;

15-IA-2734-2023.doc

ii) The applicant shall report to the trial Court,

once in four months on the day/date specified by the trial

Court, till his Appeal is finally disposed of;

iii) The applicant shall keep the trial Court

informed of his current address and mobile contact number

and/or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from

time to time;

iv) If there are two consecutive defaults in

appearing before the trial Court, the learned Judge shall

make a report to the High Court and the prosecution

would be at liberty to file an application seeking

cancellation of bail.

13 The Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

15-IA-2734-2023.doc

14 All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this

order.

            GAURI GODSE, J.                         REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.









 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter