Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8800 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 August, 2023
1 of 3 4-APL-1041-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1041 OF 2023
Naveen Sriram Luthra ...Applicant
Versus
Ajanta Packaging & Ors ...Respondents
------------
Mr. Rammani G. Upadhyay, Advocate, for Applicant.
Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP, for State/Respondent.
Digitally
signed by
------------
ASHWINI
ASHWINI JANARDAN
JANARDAN VALLAKATI
VALLAKATI Date:
2023.08.29
12:30:36
+0530 CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE : 28th AUGUST 2023
PC :
1. Leave to amend is granted to add the "Union Territory of
Daman & Diu" as party Respondent. Amendment shall be carried
out forthwith.
2. The Applicant has challenged the order passed below
Exhibit 151/D dated 5th August 2023, passed by the Judicial
Magistrate First Class, at Daman in S.C.C. No.159 of 2015.
3. The Complaint was filed by the Respondent No.1 against
the Accused No.1 company M/s. Luthra Water Systems Pvt. Ltd.
The present Applicant was the Accused No.2. It was the complaint
Ashwini V
::: Uploaded on - 29/08/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 30/08/2023 03:19:46 :::
2 of 3 4-APL-1041-2023
filed under Section 138 r/w 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881. During pendency of the said complaint, insolvency
proceedings were initiated against the Accused No.1 company
resulting finally in liquidation process. It is the case of the
Applicant that after the Resolution Professional appointed, the
Applicant or the other directors can not represent the Accused
No.1 company. He relied on the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of V.K. Jain vs. KSL Industries Ltd. & Ors. dated
11th April 2016 passed in Criminal Appeal No.663 of 2016.
According to the learned Counsel for the Applicant, the learned
trial Judge erred in holding that the Hon'ble Supreme Court had
observed that the issue of personal liability was not touched in the
said Judgment. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submitted that
the issue herein is about the representation of the company in the
Criminal proceeding and not about the personal liability. That
issue is separate and it is not raised in the Application under which
the impugned order was passed.
4. Considering these submissions, it is necessary to hear the
other side. Till this issue is answered, the ad-interim relief will
Ashwini V
::: Uploaded on - 29/08/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 30/08/2023 03:19:46 :::
3 of 3 4-APL-1041-2023
have to be granted to the Applicant.
5. Hence, the following order:
ORDER
i) Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on
2nd November 2023.
ii) Till then, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms
of prayer clause (b).
iii) Stand over to 2nd November 2023.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Ashwini V
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!