Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

International Hometex Ltd vs State Of Maharashtra
2023 Latest Caselaw 8348 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8348 Bom
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2023

Bombay High Court
International Hometex Ltd vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 August, 2023
Bench: S. V. Kotwal
                               :1:                       30.revn-st-14959-23.odt




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

  CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION [STAMP] NO.14959 OF 2023

 1. International Hometex Ltd., &
 2. Vineet Agarwal                                       ..... Applicants
             Versus
 The State of Maharashtra
 and another                                             .... Respondents

                             .....
                           WITH
        INTERIM APPLICATION [STAMP] NO.15101 OF 2023
                             IN
  CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION [STAMP] NO.14959 OF 2023

                             .....
                           WITH
        INTERIM APPLICATION [STAMP] NO.15103 OF 2023
                             IN
  CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION [STAMP] NO.14959 OF 2023


                               -----
 Ms. Smita Dandige, Advocate a/w. Rajesh Yadav for the
 Applicants.
 Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
 Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate a/w. Mukund Pandya, for the
 Respondent No.2.
                               -----

                                     CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

                                     DATE   : 17th AUGUST, 2023

                                                                           1 of 5

  Deshmane(PS)




::: Uploaded on - 17/08/2023                    ::: Downloaded on - 18/08/2023 05:38:40 :::
                                :2:                     30.revn-st-14959-23.odt



 P.C. :

 1.               Present Revision Application is on today's board.

 Interim Applications are not on board and same are taken on

 board.


 2.               The Applicants are the original accused Nos.1 &

 3 in C.C. No.1400332/SS/2010 before the Metropolitan

 Magistrate, 14th Court, Girgaon, Mumbai.              The case was

 under Section 138 read with 141 of the Negotiable

 Instruments Act, 1881. At the conclusion of the trial, the

 Applicants were convicted under those Sections.                       The

 Applicant No.1 was directed to pay fine of Rs.1,06,87,082/-.

 The Applicant No.2 was sentenced to suffer SI for six months

 and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to suffer SI for

 15 days. The complainant i.e. the Respondent No.2 herein

 was held to be entitled to get the compensation amount of

 the entire fine amount recovered from the Applicant No.1.


 3.               The Applicants along with the original accused

 No.2, who was also convicted as the Applicant No.2 herein,

                                                                         2 of 5




::: Uploaded on - 17/08/2023                  ::: Downloaded on - 18/08/2023 05:38:40 :::
                                :3:                      30.revn-st-14959-23.odt

 preferred an Appeal before the Court of Sessions, Greater

 Mumbai vide Criminal Appeal No.1050/2015 which was

 dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai

 vide his judgment and order dated 9.8.2023. The Applicants

 have challenged the said orders before this Court.


 4.               The prosecution case is that the Respondent

 No.2-complainant had advanced a loan of Rs.1,35,00,000/-

 out of which Rs.65 Lakhs were repaid by the accused and for

 the balance amount of Rs.70 Lakhs, a cheque was issued

 which was dishonored.               The Applicant No.2 is already

 arrested after the Appellate Court's judgment.


 5.               Learned counsel for the Applicants, without

 prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Applicants,

 submitted on instructions of the Applicant No.2's wife who is

 present in the Court that the Applicant No.2 would deposit a

 demand draft of Rs.45 Lakhs on 18.8.2023 before this Court.

 She further submitted that the Applicants would deposit

 Rs.45 Lakhs more on or before 31.8.2023 in this Court. She

 further submitted that the Applicants do not have any
                                                                          3 of 5




::: Uploaded on - 17/08/2023                   ::: Downloaded on - 18/08/2023 05:38:40 :::
                                :4:                         30.revn-st-14959-23.odt

 objection if said amount is withdrawn by the Respondent

 No.2 subject to the final outcome of the Revision

 Application.


 6.               The submissions made by learned counsel for the

 Applicants are quite fair and reasonable. Therefore, by way

 of ad-interim relief, I am inclined to suspend the sentence

 and grant interim bail to the Applicant No.2 till the next date

 before this Court. It is made clear that all the contentions of

 the parties are left open for admission of the Revision

 Application on the next occasion before this Court.

 7.               Hence, the following order:

                                :: O R D E R ::

i. The Applicants are permitted to deposit Rs.45

Lakhs before this Court on or before 18.8.2023. On

proof of such deposit, the sentence awarded against

the Applicants is suspended and by way of ad-

interim relief, the Applicant No.2 is directed to be

released on interim bail till the next date before

this Court on his executing a PR bond in the sum of 4 of 5

:5: 30.revn-st-14959-23.odt

Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) with one or

two sureties in the like amount. The Applicant

No.2 is permitted to furnish cash bail for a period

of two weeks.

ii. This order shall operate till the next date of listing

before this Court.

iii. The Applicants are permitted to deposit further

amount of Rs.45 Lakhs on or before 31.8.2023.

iv. The Respondent No.2 is permitted to withdraw

these amounts deposited in this Court, subject to

the final outcome of the Revision Application. The

Respondent No.2 shall execute an undertaking to

that effect before this Court before withdrawing

such amounts. The undertaking shall be part of the

record of this Revision Application.

v. Stand over to 7.9.2023. Ad-interim relief granted,

shall operate till that date.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

Deshmane (PS)

5 of 5

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter