Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rakesh Ramesh Thombre And Another vs State Of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Ps ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 8172 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8172 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2023

Bombay High Court
Rakesh Ramesh Thombre And Another vs State Of Mah., Thr. P.S.O. Ps ... on 9 August, 2023
Bench: Vinay Joshi, Valmiki Sa Menezes
Judgment                                                                  930 apl 114.20

                                             1


         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY :
                   NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
                   CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 114/2020

1.   Rakesh Ramesh Thombre,
     Aged 25 yrs., Occ. Agriculturist,
     R/o. Kukudsat, Post Lakhmapur,
     Tah. Korpana & Dist. Chandrapur.
     (Applicant No.1 is present in criminal
     revision, Chandrapur.)
2.   Pranjali Anil Bataki,
     aged about 18 yrs., Occ. Student,
     R/o. Rana Post Marda,
     Tq. Warora, Dist. Chandrapur.
                                                       ...         APPLICANTS
                                       VERSUS
     The State of Maharashtra,
     through Police Station Officer,
     Police Station Warora,
     Dist. Chandrapur.
                                                        ...       NON-APPLICANT
                          ---------------------------------
                Mr. S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate for applicants.
                Mr. N.R. Rode, APP for non-applicant/State.
                          ----------------------------------

                                CORAM    :       VINAY JOSHI AND
                                                 VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ.
                                DATE     :       09.08.2023.

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER VINAY JOSHI, J.) :

              Heard.

2. Applicants seek to quash First Information Report ('FIR')

Judgment 930 apl 114.20

vide Crime No. 1448/2019 for the offence punishable under Sections

376(1), 506 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4, 12, of the

Protection of Children From Sexual Offence Act ('POCSO') along

with charge-sheet No. 56/2020 for the offence punishable under

Section 376(2)(a), 506 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4,12 of the

POCSO Act and Section 67(b) of the Information Technology Act,

2008 registered with Police Station Warora, Chandrapur on merits as

well as on account of mutual settlement.

3. At the instance of report lodged by informant girl aged 18

years, crime was registered. According to informant, applicant had

sexually exploited her under promise of marriage. On the basis of

said report, crime was registered. The Police investigated the matter

and on completion, filed charge-sheet. It is informed that the Trial

Court has yet not framed the charges. Post registration of FIR both

in love had married on 14.02.2020 and the marriage was registered

on 28.03.2023. The marriage registration certificate has been

produced. Informant has stated on affidavit about settlement, her

marriage and non-inclination to go on with the trial.

Judgment 930 apl 114.20

4. Today, the informant girl is present before us along with

her father. Both are identified by their Advocate Mr. Sirpurkar

before the Court. On our query, the victim girl has specifically stated

that she got married with applicant No.1 (accused) on 14.02.2020

and since then she is residing with him. Additionally it is stated that

the informant and applicant No.1 had a baby from marriage and they

are residing together happily. Father of victim also stated that by the

time, both have married and residing together.

5. Though the offence is of serious nature, however this case

has peculiar facts of its own. It reveals that while the girl was at the

verge of majority, they have developed friendship through Facebook.

Applicant No.1 (accused) assured for marriage and had established

sexual relations. It is stated that the relation was out of intimacy. It

is argued that applicant No.1 got married with the girl, hence has no

intention to deceive at all. It reveals that both got married prior to

two years and blessed with a child on 09.12.2020. Presently, they

are living happily together. In the circumstances, if the prosecution

is allowed to continue, it would be at the detriment of their

matrimonial life. Since both are married and living together, there is

Judgment 930 apl 114.20

no purpose in continuing the criminal prosecution. The ends of

justice can be secured by quashing the proceeding with sole object of

saving the marriage and future of child.

6. In view of above peculiar facts, we are inclined to exercise

our inherent powers. Hence, application is allowed. We hereby

quash and set aside FIR vide Crime No. 1448/2019 for the offence

punishable under Sections 376(1), 506 of the Indian Penal Code,

Section 4, 12 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act

('POCSO') along with charge-sheet No. 56/2020 for the offence

punishable under Section 376(2)(a), 506 of the Indian Penal Code,

Section 4,12 of the POCSO Act and Section 67(b) of the Information

Technology Act, 2008 registered with Police Station Warora,

Chandrapur and pending criminal cases on account of mutual

settlement.

7. Application stands disposed of in above terms.

     (VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J.)                        (VINAY JOSHI, J.)
Gohane





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter