Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4413 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2023
19-rpl-11778-2023.doc
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.11778 OF 2023
IN
SUIT NO.833 OF 2015
Shantilal Vaghji Shah & Os. ...Petitioners
Versus
Faroukh Jehangi Karanjia & Ors. ...Respondents
----------
Mayur Khandeparkar with Anand Paid with Pratik Kothari for the
Petitioners.
Shariq Nachan with Ziyad Madon i/b. Prabhakar Jadhav for the
Plaintiffs / Respondent Nos.1 to 6.
Prerak Sharma and N.U. Dedhia for Respondent No.7.
----------
CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA J.
DATE : 28 APRIL 2023.
ORDER :
1. The delay in filing the Review Petition is condoned.
2. By this Review Petition, the Petitioner / Original
Defendant Nos. 1 to 5 have sought review of the Order and Judgment
dated 20th January, 2023 passed in Interim Application No.3359 of
2021 in Suit No.833 of 2015 and for quashing and setting aside the
same to the extent of granting prayer Clauses (b) and d(i) to d(iv).
19-rpl-11778-2023.doc
3. Mr. Khandeparkar, learned Counsel appearing for the
Petitioners has submitted that the decree on admission which was
passed by this Court vide order dated 20th January, 2023 was in
terms of prayer Clauses (a) to (d) and the amended prayers (d) (i) to
(d) (iv) of the Plaint. The prayer Clause (d) (v) was excluded by the
said Order. He has submitted that in paragraph 5 of the Affidavit in
Reply filed by the Defendant No.1 as Constituted Attorney for
Defendant Nos.2 to 5, it was stated that the Defendants who are legal
survivors of the said Shri Vaghji Nagpar Shah confirm that they are
willing to do all that needs to be done to perfect the title of the
Plaintiffs without any financial liability on their part of whatsoever
nature and on the understanding that the Plaintiffs alone will incur
all expenses in this regard. He has submitted that by the said decree
on admission passed also in terms of prayer Clauses D(i) to d(iv) is
contrary to the averment in the Affidavit in Reply which had clearly
disputed grant of such prayers making the Plaintiffs financially liable.
4. Upon a query put to the learned Counsel appearing for
the Petitioners / Plaintiffs as to whether he is agreeable to the recall
of prayer Clauses d(i) to d(iv) in respect of which decree on
admission has been passed, he very fairly responded that prayer
19-rpl-11778-2023.doc
Clauses d(i) to d(iv) may be recalled from the said order.
5. Accordingly, the said Order dated 20th January, 2023 is
modified by restricting the decree passed in the Suit to prayer
Clauses (a) to (d) and prayer Clauses d(i) to d(iv) is recalled from
the decree passed by way of the said Order.
6. Accordingly, the said order dated 20th January, 2023
stands modified to the above extent.
7. The office shall expedite the execution of the decree and
in particular prayer Clause (d) thereof by executing the Deed of
Conveyance (being Exhibit N to the Plaint) in respect of the Suit
property in favour of the Plaintiff and Defendant No.6 in terms of
prayer clause (c) of the Plaint through the Prothonotary and Senior
Master.
[ R.I. CHAGLA J. ]
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!