Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pinto @ Pintoo Sultanali Keswani vs The State Of Maharashtra
2022 Latest Caselaw 9864 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9864 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 September, 2022

Bombay High Court
Pinto @ Pintoo Sultanali Keswani vs The State Of Maharashtra on 27 September, 2022
Bench: Bharati Dangre
                                 1/2                        912 BA 2025.21.doc


      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2025 OF 2021


Pinto @ Pintoo Sultanali Keshwani              ..     Applicant
                Versus
The State of Maharashtra                       ..     Respondent
                               ...

Senior Adv. Mr. Aabad Ponda, a/w Mr. Vikram Sutaria for the
Applicant.
Ms. Veera Shinde,A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.
Mr. Sachin Mane, PI, a/w Mr. Sawant, PSI, Sewree Police Station.
                                  ...

                          CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 27th SEPTEMBER, 2022 P.C:-

1. The learned counsel Mr. Ponda has placed on record the

judgment delivered by the Special Judge and while dealing with point

no. 7 to 9, formulated during the course of trial to the effect, whether

the prosecution has proved that the accused has committed an

organized crime in furtherance of common intention, as an organized

crime syndicate headed by wanted accused and whether the

prosecution has proved that the accused persons have abetted and

conspired the commission of organized crime.

The learned Judge in Para No. 63 has specifically recorded as

under:


Ashish Mhaske





                                  2/2                      912 BA 2025.21.doc


"Even if thus admitting that the prosecution succeeds to prove continuing criminal activity as defined u/s.2(1)(d) of the MCOC Act, the organized crime could not be proved on that basis itself. The reason is simple, as noticed earlier that the prosecution has not succeeded to prove definition of 'organized crime' u/s.2(e) of MCOC Act being attracted to the present facts. Therefore I will not go into further detailed scrutiny. Accordingly, the prosecution has not succeeded to prove point nos. 7 to 9, hence I answer them in negative."

4. Let the learned APP Ms. Veera Shinde go through the

judgment and the material compiled in the charge-sheet, and make a

positive statement whether prosecution still want to continue with

the prosecution under MCOC Act, and also in absence of the said

charge, whether the applicant is entitled to be released on bail for the

IPC offences.

5. List the application on 6/10/2022, on Supplementary Board.

( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)

Ashish Mhaske

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter