Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Shri. P.V. Anthony ... vs The Gondwana University ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 10213 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10213 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2022

Bombay High Court
Dr. Shri. P.V. Anthony ... vs The Gondwana University ... on 4 October, 2022
Bench: A.S. Chandurkar, Urmila Sachin Phalke
WP 2217-15                                     1                        Judgment

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                     NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
                       WRIT PETITION NO. 2217/2015

Dr. P.V. Anthony,
Aged about 57 years, Occupation: Principal, Rashtra
Sant Tukdoji College, Chimur, District Chandrapur,
Resident of Elizabeth Villa, Saudagar Nagar,
Pimpalneri Road, Chimur, District Chandrapur.                      PETITIONER

                                   -VERSUS-

1.     The Gondwana University, Gadchiroli,
       Through its Vice Chancellor.
2.     The Gondwana University, Gadchiroli,
       Through its Registrar.
3.     Dr.S.N. Rokde, Director (Officiating),
       College and University Development Board,
       Gondwana University, Gadchiroli.
4.     Kartik Patil, Officiating Principal,
       C/o Rashtra Sant Tukdoji Mahavidyalaya, Chimur.
5.     Gandhi Sewa Shikshan Samiti, Chimur,
       Tahsil Chimur, District Chandrapur, Through
       its Secretary Kishor S. Vaidya.
6.     Rashtra Sant Tukdoji College, Chimur,
       Tahsil Chimur, District Chandrapur.
       Through its Principal.                               RESPONDENTS
__________________________________________________________________________
                Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, counsel for the petitioner.
           Shri S.A. Marathe, counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3.

CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, JJ.
DATE     : OCTOBER 04, 2022.

ORAL JUDGMENT          (PER : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

The challenge raised in this writ petition is to the communications

dated 03.03.2015 and 24.03.2015 by which the respondent no.2-

Gondwana University has granted approval to the appointment of the

respondent no.4 as officiating Principal.

WP 2217-15 2 Judgment

2. The petitioner came to be appointed on the post of Principal on

08.10.2004. This was based on the recommendation of the Selection

Committee constituted by the Nagpur University. His appointment came

to be approved by the Nagpur University on 21.12.2004. On 05.04.2013

the respondent no.2 also approved the appointment of the petitioner as

Principal. In the seniority list published by the Management in the year

2014-15 the name of the petitioner is shown at Serial Number 1 while

that of the respondent no.4 is shown at Serial Number 2. It appears that

on account of disputes in the Management it was projected that the

services of the petitioner had been placed under suspension. As a result

the salary of the staff could not be released. This resulted in filing Writ

Petition No.1579 of 2014 in this Court wherein a direction was issued to

accept the pay-bills duly signed by the senior-most Lecturer in the college.

It appears that by misconstruing the aforesaid direction as one to grant

approval to the senior-most Lecturer besides the petitioner, on 03.03.2015

and 24.03.2015 the respondent no.2 granted approval to the appointment

of the respondent no.4. Hence, this writ petition.

3. While issuing notice in the writ petition this Court granted interim

relief by staying the aforesaid communications dated 03.03.2015 and

24.03.2015. The respondent no.4 has not appeared in the writ petition

despite notice being served. The respondent no.4 on 19.09.2014 issued a

communication to the Principal stating therein that he was not interesting WP 2217-15 3 Judgment

in functioning as the In-charge Principal and that it was the petitioner

who was functioning as Principal. With passage of time the petitioner has

now superannuated.

4. In these facts we find that there was no dispute whatsoever as

regards the seniority of the petitioner as well as his appointment and

subsequent approval on the post of Principal. It is only on account of

incorrectly interpreting the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.

1579 of 2014 that the impugned communications dated 03.03.2015 and

24.03.2015 came to be issued. These communications were never acted

upon in view of the interim relief granted. Since the petitioner has now

retired from service, by making the interim relief absolute, the writ

petition is disposed of. Rule accordingly. No costs.

(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

APTE

Signed By: Digitally signed byROHIT DATTATRAYA APTE Signing Date:04.10.2022 18:12

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter