Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12392 Bom
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2022
2.WP.14702.22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14702 OF 2022
CR Retail Malls (India) Limited ... Petitioner
Versus
PVR Limited ... Respondent
Mr. Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Neveille Mukerji, Ms.
Sanaya Contractor and Ms. Juhi Bahirwani i/b Veritas Legal for the
Petitioner.
Mr. Soli Cooper, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Yohann Cooper and Ms. Bency
Ramakrishnan i/b Mr. Akash Menon for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA, J.
DATED : 30th NOVEMBER, 2022.
ORDER :
1 Heard Mr. Sharan Jagtiani, learned Senior Counsel appearing
for the Petitioner and Mr. Soli Cooper, learned Senior Counsel appearing
for the Respondent.
2 After substantial arguments were advanced on the challenge
to the impugned judgment and order dated 19.10.2022 which had
allowed the application for amendment to be carried out by the
Respondent to their plea in accordance with law, Mr. Cooper, on
Waghmare 1/3
2.WP.14702.22.doc
instructions states that the amendment will not be carried out during the
pendency of the hearing of the Writ Petition. Statement is accepted.
3 There are certain observations in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the
impugned judgment and order which in fact runs counter to the
observations in paragraph 10, namely that "It has been equally laid down
by Their Lordships that, the correctness or falsity of the case shall not be
gone into while deciding the amendment application. Moreover, there is
absolutely no propriety to go for the findings on the merits of the
amendment. Therefore, having regard to the said basic principle of law
laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court, we need to find out as to what
amendment the revision petitioners are going to carry out in their plea."
The Appellate Court of Small Causes has infact in paragraphs 11 and 12
considered the merits of the dispute and made certain observations which
would have a bearing on both the Suits i.e. the Suit filed by the
Respondent as well as Suit filed by the Petitioner which are pending
before the Trial Court. Accordingly, the observations in paragraphs 11
and 12 which are on the merits of the dispute shall not be given effect to
and/or shall be disregarded by the Trial Court in considering both the
Suits.
4 Considering the narrow conspectus in the Writ Petition
Waghmare 2/3
2.WP.14702.22.doc
concerning the issue as to whether the amendment sought for by the
Respondent in its Suit is required to be allowed, the Writ Petition shall be
heard and disposed of at the admission stage.
5 The Writ Petition No.3600 of 2021 filed by the Respondent
shall also be tagged with this Writ Petition in view of the challenge
therein to an order passed by the Appellate Court of Small Causes which
may have a bearing in this Writ Petition as it concerns the termination
notice dated 30.07.2020 of which the Respondent has sought to be
incorporated in its Suit by way of amendment.
6 Place Writ Petition No.14702 of 2022 and Writ Petition No.
3600 of 2021 on 18.01.2023 for hearing at the admission stage.
7 This Court is apprised of the fact that a consolidation
application dated 06.04.2022 i.e. Exhibit-15 has been moved by the
Respondent before the Trial Court for consolidating both Suits i.e. the Suit
filed by the Respondent as well as Suit filed by the Petitioner and to be
heard together.
8 The Trial Court shall hear and dispose of the consolidation
application prior to proceeding with both the Suits.
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.)
Digitally signed
by WAISHALI
WAISHALI SUSHIL
Waghmare 3/3
SUSHIL WAGHMARE
WAGHMARE Date:
2022.12.03
11:06:01 +0530
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!