Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2703 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2022
53.SA.153.22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO.153 OF 2022
WITH CA/4020/2022 IN SA/153/2022
LAXMIBAI LAXMAN KANDHARE
VERSUS
SHANTABAI LAXMAN KANDHARE AND ORS
...
Advocate for Appellants : Mr. Suryawanshi Govind G.
...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 21.03.2022
PER COURT :
Heard.
2. This is a second appeal by the original defendant No.3 who had
successfully defended the suit of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 claiming to be
the wife of deceased Laxman and claiming a right to receive family pension.
By the judgment and order under challenge, the District Court allowed their
appeal, quashed and set aside the judgment and order passed by the trial
court and decreed the suit. There are inconsistent findings of the courts
below.
3. Apparently, the appellant has been claiming to be the wife of
Laxman. There was record to demonstrate that he had shown her as
nominee in the pension papers and accordingly has been admittedly
receiving the family pension. Even she is armed with a heirship certificate
issued under Bombay Regulation. Though there was a challenge by the
53.SA.153.22.odt
respondent Nos.1 and 2 to such certificate, the Appeal was dismissed. The
lower appellate court has refused to give any weightage to the factum of
heirship certificate having been issued in favour of the respondent No.3 as
the heir of deceased Laxman which decision has reached finality.
4. In view of the above circumstances, the Second Appeal involves
substantial question of law. Issue notices before admission, returnable on
02.05.2022. Till then execution and operation of the order passed by the
lower appellate court stand stayed.
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
habeeb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!