Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2629 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2022
(5)-WP-9622-13.doc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally
signed by
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BALAJI
BALAJI GOVINDRAO
GOVINDRAO PANCHAL
PANCHAL Date:
WRIT PETITION NO.9622 OF 2013
2022.03.17
09:52:28
+0530
M/s. Deepak Builders Private Limited ..Petitioner
Versus
Sureshkumar Pukhraji Jain alias
Khimsera and Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Pooja Kane a/w Laxman Jain i/by Yogesh Adhia, for the
Petitioner.
Mr. Chaitanya Rane a/w Kalyani Bane i/by M/s. Divekar & Co., for
the Respondent No.1.
Mr. Abbas Zaidy a/w Aditya A. Kavale i/by Zohair & Co., for
Respondent Nos.2A to 2D.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 16th MARCH, 2022
P.C.
1. Relying on the judgment of Apex Court in the matter of Man Kaur Vs. Hartar Singh Sangha reported in (2010) 10 SCC 512 the contention is, in a suit for specific performance evidence of Power of Attorney cannot be considered.
2. The issue of readiness and willingness is sought to be invoked. That being so, the Power of Attorney need not be examined on the said issue.
3. That being so, the order impugned dated 28th August,
BGP. 1 of 2 (5)-WP-9622-13.doc.
2013 is hereby quashed and set aside.
4. Parties are directed to address the Court below afresh on the aforesaid issue.
5. Trial Court is directed to decide the matter having regard to the aforesaid judgment and other provisions of law.
6. The petition stands allowed in above terms.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
BGP. 2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!