Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2304 Bom
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2022
WP 2476-21 1 Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2476/2021
Vijaylaxmi W/o Balayya Borkute
(Nee: Vijaylaxmi D/o Vyankati Durgam),
Aged about 27 years, Occ. Service,
R/o At Jafrabad Chak, Post Tekda (Talla),
Tah. Sironcha, Dist. Gadchiroli. PETITIONER
.....VERSUS.....
1. State of Maharashtra,
Through its Secretary,
Department of Women and Child Development,
Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
2. Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli,
Through its Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad Complex, Gadchiroli, Dist. Gadchiroli.
3. Integrated child Development Officer, Sironcha,
Tah. Sironcha, Dist. Gadchiroli.
4. Child Development Project Officer,
Integrated Child Development Welfare Scheme,
Sironcha, Tah. Sironcha, Dist. Gadchiroli.
5. Sapna W/o Bapu Barsagandi
(Nee: Sapna D/o Swami Mudmadigela),
aged about 25 years, Occ. Service,
R/o At Mokyala, Post Tekda (Talla),
Tq. Sironcha, Dist. Gadchiroli. RESPONDENT S
Shri S.V. Deshpande with Shri Shankar Borkuta, counsel for the petitioner.
Ms N.P. Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos.1, 3 and 4.
Shri A.R. Fule, counsel for the respondent no.2.
Mrs. Gayatri R. Diwe-Puranik, Advocate with Shri P.R. Agrawal, counsel for the
respondent no.5.
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, JJ.
DATE : 08TH MARCH, 2022.
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard the learned
counsel for the parties.
WP 2476-21 2 Judgment
2. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 11.11.2020
that has been issued by the Child Welfare Officer under the Integrated
Child Development Welfare Scheme thereby appointing the respondent
no.5 on the post of Anganwadi Sevika which post was initially held by the
petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that she resides at village
Jafrabad, Tahsil Sironcha, District Gadchiroli. On 30.01.2017 she was
appointed on the post of Anganwadi Helper. Subsequently by an order
dated 04.05.2020 she was appointed on the post of Anganwadi Sevika.
Shortly thereafter on 13.05.2020 she was reverted to the post of
Anganwadi Helper since the Authorities were not clear as regards the
entitlement of the petitioner to be appointed on the post of Anganwadi
Sevika. The subsequent appointment of the respondent no.5 as
Anganwadi Sevika is thus under challenge.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after
perusing the documents on record, it is found that the petitioner on
18.05.2020 and 07.12.2020 had made representations to the Chief
Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli to support her entitlement to
the post of Anganwadi Sevika. Since we find that certain factual aspects
would require adjudication, the interests of justice would be served by
directing the Chief Executive Officer to consider and decide the
representations dated 18.05.2020 and 07.05.2020 in accordance with the WP 2476-21 3 Judgment
prevailing policy. The Chief Executive Officer shall grant an opportunity
of hearing to the petitioner as well as the respondent no.5 to facilitate
such adjudication. A decision thereon be taken within a period of six
weeks from the date of production of this order before the Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli. All points raised on merits are kept
open.
4. The writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid directions.
Rule accordingly. No costs.
(SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
APTE
Signed By: Digitally signed byROHIT DATTATRAYA APTE Signing Date:09.03.2022 17:30
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!