Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2245 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2022
rpa 1/2 31 apeal 1604 2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1604 OF 2019
Shrivardhan Govardhansingh Tapasvi .. Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
......
Mr.Lokesh Zade i/b. Mr.Adwait Bhonde, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr.Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent - State.
......
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATED : MARCH 07, 2022.
P.C. :
This Appeal has been preferred under Section 454 of
Cr.P.C., challenging the order with relating to return of property
passed vide judgment and order dated 23rd February, 1994.
2 Learned APP submitted that in accordance with Section
454 of Cr.P.C, such Appeal would lie to the Court to which Appeal
ordinary lie from conviction by the former Court. In the present case, Digitally signed by RAJESHRI the accused was prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section RAJESHRI PRAKASH PRAKASH AHER AHER Date:
2022.03.09 15:37:06 302 of IPC. He has been acquitted. If the said accused would have been +0530
convicted for the said offence, the Appeal would lie before the Division
Bench. Hence, this Appeal will have to be heard by the Division Bench
bench of this Court.
rpa 2/2 31 apeal 1604 2019.doc 3 In the light the aforesaid circumstances, the Registry is
directed to verify whether the matter would lie before the Single
Judge or the Division Bench. Report be submitted on or before next
date of hearing.
4 Stand over to 21st March, 2022.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!