Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5286 Bom
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2022
1/3
12-wpl18149-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 18149 OF 2022
ATC Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioner
versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater
Mumbai & Ors. ... Respondents
...
Adv. D. S. Patil for the Petitioner.
Ms. Madhuri More for the Respondent-BMC
...
CORAM : A.A. SAYED &
ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATED : 10 JUNE 2022 P.C.:
The Petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
a. that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records and proceedings pertaining to the issuance of the Impugned Notice dated 9 March 2022 (Exhibit L) and Impugned Oder dated 3 June 2022 received by Petitioner on 7 June 2022 (Exhibit-N); and after considering the legality and propriety thereof to quash and set aside the same;
b. that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of the Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the Respondent No.1 an 2 to forthwith withdraw and cancel the Impugned Notice dated 9 March 2022 (Exhibit-L) and Impugned Order dated 3 June 2022 received by Petitioner on 7 June 2022 (Exhibit-N);
Uday.P.Kambli 1/3
12-wpl18149-2022.doc
c) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus
or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or other under Article 226 of the Constitution of India restraining the Respondents, their subordinates and officers from taking any further steps in furtherance to and/or in implementation of the Impugned Notice Impugned Notice dated 9 March 2022 (Exhibit- L) and Impugned Order dated 3 June 2022 received by Petitioner on 7 June 2022 (Exhibit-N));
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has pointed out the Application
dated 16 January 2016 (Exh. A to the Petition). The said Application was
made by the Petitioner to the Commissioner, MCGM for regularisation of the
Cellular Tower.
3. Learned Counsel for the Respondent-Corporation states that under
the new policy all such Regularisation Applications have to be made online.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner would make a
fresh online Regularisation Application within a period of three weeks from
today. If such online Regularisation Application is made, the same shall be
decided by the Respondent-Corporation expeditiously and the decision
thereof shall be communicated to the Petitioner.
4. In view of the Division Bench Judgment dated 12 th September, 2014
in WPL/2043/2014 (Tower and Infrastructure Providers Association & Anr.
vs The State of Maharashtra) we direct that no coercive steps shall be
taken against the Petitioner until the decision on the Regularisation
Uday.P.Kambli 2/3
12-wpl18149-2022.doc
Application of the Petitioner is taken and for a further period of two weeks
from the date of receipt of the decision by the Petitioner.
5. The Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(ABHAY AHUJA,J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.) Uday.P.Kambli 3/3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!