Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr. Prashant Sadashivrao Pande vs State Of Maharashtra, Through Its ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 873 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 873 Bom
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2022

Bombay High Court
Mr. Prashant Sadashivrao Pande vs State Of Maharashtra, Through Its ... on 24 January, 2022
Bench: A.S. Chandurkar, Mukulika Shrikant Jawalkar
WP 864-19                                       1                    Judgment

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                      NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                   WRIT PETITION NO. 864/2019

Prashant Sadashivrao Pande,
aged about 44 years, Occ. Service,
R/o Dharmakshetra, Ganesh Nagar, Umarkhed,
Tah. Umarkhed, Dist. Yavatmal.                                   PETITIONER

                               .....VERSUS.....

1.   State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary,
     School Education and Sports Department,
     Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
2.   Deputy Director of Education, Amravati Division,
     Amravati.
3.   The Education Officer (Secondary),
     Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal.
4.   Anglo Vernacular Education Society,
     through its Secretary, Umarkhed, Dist. Yavatmal.
5.   Sakle Vidyalaya, through its Headmaster,
     Umarkhed, Dist. Yavatmal.                                RESPONDENT S


               Shri Anand Parchure, counsel for the petitioner.
Ms H.N. Jaipurkar, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos.1 to 3.
         Shri M.Y. Wadodkar, counsel for the respondent nos.4 and 5.



CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, JJ.
DATE    : 24TH JANUARY, 2022.
ORAL JUDGMENT          (PER : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)



Considering the reply filed on behalf of the respondent nos.4

and 5 the writ petition is taken up for hearing and decided finally by

issuing RULE and making it returnable forthwith.

WP 864-19 2 Judgment

2. The petitioner claimed to be a Trained Graduate Teacher

having obtained qualifications of B.A. and B.Ed. He is presently working

as Assistant Teacher at the respondent no.5-School. It is his case that he

is entitled to be placed in the Trained Graduate Teacher quota which is at

25% of the total teaching staff. Such claim is made from the year 2012.

3. In the reply filed by the respondent nos.4 and 5 it has been

stated that one Assistant Teacher Shri D.B. Kude who was discharging

duties as a Trained Graduate Teacher expired in June-2021 and hence the

said post is now lying vacant. The respondents have indicated their

willingness to send the name of the petitioner for being approved on that

post which forms part of the trained graduate quota.

4. In view of aforesaid, the grievance made by the petitioner can

be redressed by issuing following directions:

(I) The respondent nos.4 and 5 shall send a proposal seeking

approval to the placement of the petitioner as Trained Graduate Teacher

in 25% quota within a period of three weeks from today.

(II) The Education Officer (Secondary) shall within a period of

four weeks from receipt of that proposal take a decision on the question

of grant of approval. The decision taken be communicated to the

petitioner. The proposal be decided on its own merits and in accordance

with law.

WP 864-19 3 Judgment

5. Rule is made absolute in aforesaid terms. No costs.

(SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

APTE

Signed By: Digitally signed byROHIT DATTATRAYA APTE Signing Date:25.01.2022 13:21

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter