Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 395 Bom
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2022
904-OSWPL-478-2022.DOC
Sonali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 478 OF 2022
Tata Autocomp Systems Ltd ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 487 OF 2022
Indexone Infracon Pvt Ltd ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Respondents
WITH
Digitally
signed by WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 504 OF 2022
SONALI
SONALI MILIND
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
2022.01.12
West India Continental Oil Fats Pvt Ltd ...Petitioner
12:24:52 Versus
+0530
The State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Respondents
Mr Ashish Rao, with Nishit Dhruva, Prakash Shinde, Niyati
Merchant, Yash Dhruva, i/b MDP & Partners, for the Petitioner.
Mrs PH Kantharia, GP, for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM G.S. Patel &
Madhav J. Jamdar, JJ.
DATED: 11th January 2022
PC:-
11th January 2022
904-OSWPL-478-2022.DOC
1. On 15th December 2021 in Writ Petition (L) No. 12718 of 2021 we passed the following order:
"1. In view of the decision of the Gujarat High Court of 8th September 2011 in Letters Patent Appeal No. 6 of 2011, and the fact that there is pending Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s) 36159-36173 of 2011, we issue Rule.
2. On account of the judgment of the Gujarat High Court we will be required to grant interim stay in terms of prayer clause (d) which reads thus:
"(d) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present writ petition, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondents to immediately cease and desist from levying Stamp Duty on Bills of Entry for clearance of goods from Customs Notified Area, under Article 29 of Schedule I of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 or under any other Article or Section of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958."
3. We note that the Supreme Court declined to stay the order of the Gujarat High Court in the SLP filed by the State of Gujarat. It is for this reason that we must grant the interim relief referred to above.
4. Mr Nankani clarifies that relevant prayer clause in the Petition is prayer clause (b), not prayer clause (a).
5. Leave to amend forthwith without need of reverification to include a formal averment that the Petitioner has demanded justice but justice has been denied.
11th January 2022 904-OSWPL-478-2022.DOC
6. Rule made returnable on 17th March 2022. Respondents Nos 1 and 2 waive service. Hamdast permitted for service on Respondent Nos 3, 4 and 5."
2. We pass the same order in the present Petitions by issuing Rule and permitting hamdast. We also grant interim stay in terms of prayer clause (d).
3. Leave to amend the present Petitions. Amendment be carried out within two weeks without need of reverification.
4. All concerned will act on production of a digitally signed copy of this order.
(Madhav J. Jamdar, J) (G. S. Patel, J)
11th January 2022
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!