Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maroti S/O Vyankati Gaikwad And ... vs Dy. Director And Member ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 122 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 122 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2022

Bombay High Court
Maroti S/O Vyankati Gaikwad And ... vs Dy. Director And Member ... on 4 January, 2022
Bench: S.B. Shukre, Anil Laxman Pansare
                                                                                         1                                                       W.P.No.12.2022

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

                                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 12 OF 2022

                     Maroti S/o Vyankati Gaikwad and Ors.,
                                      ..VS..
 Deputy Director & Member-Secretary, The Scheduled Tribe Caste Cetificate Scrutiny
                        Committee, Amravati and Ors.,
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,                                                                     Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Shri Ananta Ramteke, Advocate for petitioners.
                                               Smt. S. S. Jachak, A.G.P. for respondent No.1.


                                                             CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
                                                                     ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

DATED : 04.01.2022

1. Heard.

2. The contention is that the oldest entry of the grandfather of the petitioners is in the name of "Mana" and therefore, the Scrutiny Committee ought not to have rejected only because some entries in subsequent years indicated caste of the grandfather of the petitioners as "Kunbi".

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the word "Kunbi" is rather conclusive and it is not uncommon to identify this word with the land cultivator community and, therefore, whenever a person shows his caste as "Kunbi", it is likely that he is only indicating his occupation and not the caste. Reliance has been placed upon the judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench

of this Court dated 30.08.2018 delivered in Writ Petition No.5481 of 2018.

3. Issue notice for final disposal at admission stage to the respondents, returnable after two weeks.

4. Smt. S. S. Jachak, learned A.G.P. waives service of notice for respondent No.1.

5. Meanwhile, we direct that there shall be status-quo in relation to the service of the petitioner No.3, until further orders.

                                    JUDGE                    JUDGE




          Kirtak




Digitally Signed By:KIRTAK
BHIMRAO JANARDHAN
Signing Date:04.01.2022
17:47
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter