Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anant S/O Ramrao Nirmal vs State Of Mah. Thr. Ps Incharge Ps ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 1620 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1620 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2022

Bombay High Court
Anant S/O Ramrao Nirmal vs State Of Mah. Thr. Ps Incharge Ps ... on 16 February, 2022
Bench: Avinash G. Gharote
                                                                                                                                                                apl279.21.odt
                                                                                           1


                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

                             CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 279 OF 2021
                          Anant Ramrao Nirmal...Versus...The State of Maharashtra
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,                                                                             Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders or directions
and Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ -

                                                           Mr. P.S.Wathore, Advocate for the applicant
                                                           Mr. A.R.Chutke, APP for respondent/State


                                                                                        CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 16/02/2022

1] The application challenges the framing of charge and the judgment of the learned Sessions Court dated 27.01.2021, by which challenge to the same came to be rejected.

2] Mr. Wathore, learned counsel for the applicant contends that the misappropriation has taken place at Rural Water Supply Department, Sub Division Anjangaon Surji, with which the applicant had no concern whatsoever, as he was never posted at Anjangaon Surji at any point of time. The posting of the applicant was all the times at Amravati Zilla Parishad in the Water Works Department as a Senior Account Officer. It is contended that Mr. Anis Ahmad was the person who was occupying the post earlier to the applicant and had not handed over the user Id and password of the system, as a apl279.21.odt

result of which it was impossible for the applicant to enter into the system or access the same in any manner whatsoever, in view of which it is contended that there is no substance in the contention that the applicant was a willing participant in the matter of misappropriation of funds earmarked for the salary bills of Class-III & IV employees of the Water Works Department to the tune of Rs. 63,22,608/-. It is contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated by subsequently inserting his name in the FIR. Great reliance is placed upon the document evincing handing over of charge dated 25.7.2017 (page 71) to indicate that the user Id & password was not given to the applicant by his predecessor while handing over the charge. Reliance is also placed upon the preliminary enquiry report by the Committee constituted for this purpose dated 30.10.2018 (page 57), which absolves the applicant of any complicity in the matter. He therefore contends that the failure of the learned Sessions Court to consider this position has resulted into grave injustice, due to which the applicant is required to face the trial.

3] Learned APP submits that the reliance placed upon the document of handing over of charge by the applicant to contend that the password of the system was not given to the applicant, is misplaced for the reason that the successor of the applicant namely one Shri Pritam K. Chavhan apl279.21.odt

has categorically stated that he had taken the charge of the post from the applicant on 6.10.2018 (page 75). He further places reliance upon the statement of Anis Ahmad, the predecessor of the applicant who in his statement before the Enquiry Committee has stated that while handing over the charge on 9.7.2017 to the applicant, he had given the password and user id of the Sevarth Pranali Stage-2, as well as the password and the user id of the CMP to the applicant (page 61).

4] The mode of handing over the password and user id however is not spelt out from the record and therefore in order to test the rival averments, it is necessary to look into the same, considering which, learned APP to place on record the procedure for handing over the charge in respect of the password and user id of the Sevarth Pranali Stage-2 system and the CMP or any general procedure prescribed in that regard and any notification in that regard on record.

5]           List the matter on 23.2.2022.




                                        JUDGE


Rvjalit
                                                   Digitally sign byRAJESH
                                                   VASANTRAO JALIT
                                                   Location:
                                                   Signing Date:16.02.2022 17:28
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter